My own thoughts are why should the taxpayers have to pay to put security systems into the homes of judges when they have the finacial withal to install them for themselves.
1 posted on
03/07/2005 3:07:40 PM PST by
LauraJean
To: LauraJean
RKV want's to know why judges just don't buy a shotgun like the rest of us plebes.
2 posted on
03/07/2005 3:11:49 PM PST by
RKV
( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
To: LauraJean
Maybe because of that inconvenient "equal protection of the law" thing.
3 posted on
03/07/2005 3:15:56 PM PST by
thoughtomator
(Gleefully watching the self-demolition of all things left-wing)
To: LauraJean
Great! Why don't we install special things for judges, EVERY Federal, State and Local Official, Jurors in controversial cases, Bloggers in general and on and on. Don't think so.
Another solution from someone who thinks there is no cost to 'Security' and that public coffers are limitless. IMO He should work for the TSA.
4 posted on
03/07/2005 3:18:12 PM PST by
drt1
To: LauraJean
Chuck Goudie
5 posted on
03/07/2005 3:25:31 PM PST by
kcvl
To: LauraJean
Maybe we should pass a Constitutional Amendment saying that everyone can arm themselves. That way these judges, and the rest of us, could protect ourselves, our families, and our homes.
6 posted on
03/07/2005 3:55:37 PM PST by
gitmo
(Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
To: LauraJean
I detect a singular lack of respect for our lords and masters. For Shame!
11 posted on
03/07/2005 4:54:34 PM PST by
McGarrett
(Book'em Danno)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson