[ClintonBeGone]

I agree with the concept. Two-thirds of the cable channels are subsidized junk anyway. If people got to choose their line-up, most of those would go under. I would much rather pay for 25 good watchable channels than have to weed through the 70 I get.

Could you two possibly be missing the point of the article?

[sixmil]

Could you two possibly be missing the point of the article?

hah! I was going to say the same thing, but then again I don't think it is news to most around here that McKain's on the take.

[pawdoggie]

Could you two possibly be missing the point of the article? I think you're all missing the point of the article which is found in the "AP" byline. McCain's real or imagined "hypocisy" notwithstanding; the virtues and vices of "a la carte" cable notwithstanding; the real import of this article is that a reliably Leftie Democrat news organization has turned on straight-talking "Honest John". Et pourquoi? Perhaps because McCain is the current default leader in the GOP 2008 presidential nominee sweepstakes? Perhaps because a certain she-b*tch from hell who happens to be the nominal Democrat 2008 front-runner is currently speaking about how women in politics are inherently less corrupt than the male of the species, and needs a good illustration in point? You people need to get a clue, instead of letting the MSM lead you around by the nose. In a McCain-Hillary slug fest, I for one am not going to cut off my nose to spite my face.