Posted on 03/08/2005 8:56:06 AM PST by kiriath_jearim
You may be putting limits on the sentence for burglery that I am not. I would make that a minimum of five years. That would be for breaking into someone's house without a gun.
And the jail would be a compound, not a modern prison. The necessities of life would be there - food, shelter, washing facilities. But, it would be a long boring 5 years with no TV, no weight rooms. Clean safe and the most boring place. The cooks would prepare only English food (except no fish and chips).
On the armed burglery, it would be 10 years of the same.
It works in other countries. It can work here also. States that have "harsher" sentences does not mean they have sentences that are harsh enough.
Take Singapore. Very low crime rate. English law and a fair trial. Most people "don't do it" because they know the consequences are harsh. The ones that do, they get tough sentences and don't do it again.
If people are repeating crimes, then sentences and the prison conditions simply were not harsh enough. There is nothing complicated about it.
Okay smartass, my cousin was shot in Philly. The perp had a rap sheet a mile long. My uncle, although not raped, was killed by a drunk driver who had dozens of DUI's and had already killed someone in a previuos DUI caused accident. Personally, I was mugged when I was a young adult by a bunch of thugs with priors longer than your sleeve.
Next time, take your smugness elsewhere, pal.
Oh, and if you are looking for rape, a classmate of mine was raped and murdered. Never did catch the guy, but I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that it wasn't the first time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.