Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie
I love how people here know how Krugman misrepresents the facts on a regular basis and yet jump for his spin, simply because he does it more subtly this time around. This isn't the people vs. big business. This is an epidemic of irresponsibility amongst credit card users- who bite off more than they can chew financially, incur debts, and then refuse to pay for their shopping spree. And who ultimately get stuck with the tab. We do- through higher rates. You've read Krugman's spin, which I admit he's very clever at. But you can also read the facts here AEI
92 posted on 03/09/2005 2:26:32 AM PST by jagrmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jagrmeister
I avoided the credit card hucksters when I was in college, but I know people who didn't and got hurt badly.

Usury is unbiblical. It should be illegal. If I give somebody who makes $20,000 a year, with no sign that they will do better, $10,000 and write a contract with them for 30% interest payments, yes, they were an adult and are responsible, but where is my responsibility? They deliberately go after people who can't pay on time, in order to collect usury type repayments.

It isn't ethical practice. It's loan sharking. Plain and simple. There was a case I am familiar with, where several credit card companies gave out $35,000 in cards to a woman with alzheimers living only on SS checks. How did they reasonably think they would be paid? A: They tried to intimidate her kids into paying it off. These people are leeches.

As has been noticed before, they try to get you with the fees. Even when you pay your check on time, they pretend that you don't get it to them, when you do.

One cute thing my brother's bank does is this scenario. He made an error in his bank book. He thought he had $300 in his account, when he only had $100. He writes 3 checks over 2 days. Two checks for $25 and $50 were written the first day. The next day he pays a check for a $110 bill. What the bank does is pretend they get the $110 bill first, charged him overdraft fees for all 3 checks for $30 a pop.

If they were honest, they would have cleared the two smaller checks, and bounced the $110 one. They don't on purpose. I investigated with him. It's company policy to try to figure out the way to get you the most fees as possible even if they have to be dishonest and pretend that they always get the toppler bill first.

He screwed up, made a mistake, and bounced one check. He should/can have the fees imposed against him. That is not what happened. The late fees are just too tempting for the bank to be honorable.

My local bank stinks, but at least I know their policy. Any check you deposit after 2pm, 2pm!!!! doesn't count until the next day. Under their policy, if you deposit a check at 2:01 PM on Friday afternoon, if you write a check out before 11:59 PM on Monday evening, they will charge you a bounced check fee. I know this policy, but I wouldn't have without reading the fine print.

This is not honest business practice. They are leeches.

94 posted on 03/09/2005 4:06:31 AM PST by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson