To: SandRat
Oh yea, that whole 'tanks don't need to be supported by infantry' thing. I forgot about that.
Some genius actually figured out that some guys with mud on their boots might like to talk to the guy in the big armored thingy over there, and that the aforemention guy with mud on his boots might not have a radio.
Whodathunkit.....
L
8 posted on
03/10/2005 8:51:32 PM PST by
Lurker
(Remember the Beirut Bombing; 243 dead Marines. The House of Assad and Hezbollah did it..)
To: Lurker
The guy with mud caked on his boots.
13 posted on
03/10/2005 8:54:16 PM PST by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Lurker
Eh, it was supposed to be supported by mounted infantry in Bradleys. (shrug)
And, as I said, infantry was *supposed* to get short range personal commo sets, but that didn't work out.
19 posted on
03/10/2005 8:57:38 PM PST by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson