Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: buffyt

I would tend to disagree. In the middle ages, populations were not mobile...People were born, lived and died, within a few miles...there was haredly any travel between villages. That's how the plague ended..it burned itself out...When everyone in a village was dead, it died off..


15 posted on 03/12/2005 2:08:29 PM PST by ken5050 (The Dem party is as dead as the NHL..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ken5050

Most people stayed put in the Middle Ages, true, but there were always small groups who traveled: tinkers, pilgrims, merchants, mendicant friars, messengers, and so forth. It was enough to spread the plague.

The evidence suggests that when regions were attacked by recurrences of the plague, mortality decreased.

The same was true of syphillis, which killed people rapidly in the earliest outbreaks around 1492 but became less deadly, or at least much slower to act, as time went on.


18 posted on 03/12/2005 2:18:20 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050
In the middle ages, populations were not mobile.

Apparently the Bubonic plague started in China and was spread by trade to Europe.

26 posted on 03/12/2005 3:15:30 PM PST by Woliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson