[Judith Anne]

Here's the red flag:

Even though this issue does affect gay people, it is an issue of fundamental civil rights and sensible health policies.

I can't believe civil rights of homosexual men have ANYTHING to do with the right of a patient to expect HIV free blood. Anyone who argues this is arguing for murder.

[Clint N. Suhks]

If 10 units of blood potentially infects one to two people per year, then 13 units would potentially infect one to three people, while over 176,000 more people would potentially be protected from the dangers of blood shortages.

This is simply scary logic. It reminds me of a movie I had to see in English class my sophomore year in high school, called The Lottery.

Where one of the town's people is sacrificed (stoned to death) each year for the good of the people...i.e. "convoluted reasoning".

Here, this genius thinks it's OK to risk one more person's health for the benefit of others. It's sick logic, and all so those who practice perversion can pretend to be normal.

[gidget7]

They don't have anything to do with it..........it's not anyones civil right to give blood! Ask anyone who has ever been underweight, has a virus of any kind, has recently had a tattoo, is a IV drug user. There are any number of reason a person can, and should be turned down.

[Badray]

I can't believe civil rights of homosexual men have ANYTHING to do with the right of a patient to expect HIV free blood. Anyone who argues this is arguing for murder.

Hey, it's only 3 people a year. It not like everyone will get sick and die. /gagging

Is this sick SOB serious? So what if only 3 people get sick and die from their sick perverted activities? If their perversion wasn't bad enough, this really shows how twisted they are.