Homosexual Agenda Ping.
Just to wake you all up. Interesting comments on the thread.
I don't know about you, but I'm ready for some serious civil disobedience if the black robed wicked fools keep this up.
Let me and DirtyHarryY2K know if you want on/off this pinglist.
Time to recall some judges.
Get-out-of-the-blue-state-while-you-still-can ping
So Art Bell's earthquake prediction will definitely come true- maybe sooner than we think.
Who is this turkey ?
I have said it before, and I am not kidding. Someday, there will be a lawsuit by someone wanting to marry his goat. Don't laugh. If someone can change a thousands year old definition of marriage, why can't they change it again? What about consent? Well, what about it? A court could determine that an animal has no right to give consent, and the wishes of the pervert is what controls. After all, if a guy is screwing his goat, what business is it of yours? People have willed money to their pets.
Well, it does seem unconstitutional. I mean, isn't that why some think there would have to be a constitutional amendment against it for it to remain illegal? I understand how people can say they hate it, but I don't think they have a leg to stand on when it comes to the question of whether it is constitutional or not. You have to mandate something that makes it okay not to extend equal rights that aren't covered by some other thing like harm to others.
Who is Dick Krammer?
BUT .. THERE IS A STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IN PROCESS AND IT HAS RECENTLY CLEARED ANOTHER HURDLE.
This judge's decision will probably cause this amendment to be more widely supported.
Adding CA to the prayer list with WA on this matter. Do you know when you will hear from State supremes on the hearing from last week?
Other than the will of the people.
BELIEVE IT.....THEY ARE COMING FOR THE CHILDREN (gay marriage, then widespread gay adoption)
dfu commentary | 2-27-04 | dfu
Posted on 02/27/2004 4:10:32 PM PST by doug from upland
It has happened in San Francisco. It has now happened in a town in New York. It is threatened in Chicago. Gay marriage is here in all of its rainbow glory. We don't have time for a Constitutional amendment to stop it.
What is it that gays want? The right to visit in the hospital? They have it. The right to will property? They have it. The right for insurance benefits? They have it.
What they want is not tolerance. They have been given tolerance. What they really want is recognition that marriage between two people of the same sex is just as noble as marriage between a man and a woman (as it has been for thousands of years around the world).
Most of us believe in just letting people alone in the privacy of their bedrooms. That has nothing to do with abortion, however, because an abortion results in the death of an innocent. If you believe homosexuality is wrong, you also probably believe that a sinner will eventually meet his Maker. It will be up to God to judge.
But the activist gays have gone way over the top. They are attempting to destroy an institution that has proven to be the best way to raise children and provide for a continuity in society. Moms and dads raising kids is the best thing for children. Gays will never admit that it is better to have a mom and dad. They change the argument and make it a comparison of a divorced couple vs. a loving gay home, whatever that may be.
The next step is logical. Not only do gays want the right to adopt, which they have in several states, but they want equality. They want the adoption and welfare agencies to be gender blind. If a child is available, they want an equal right to adopt. A married man and woman should have no advantage.
They are getting close to that. What will stop them? If they are allowed to marry, not just have some civil arrangement for living, they will sue for adoptive equality. It will only take a few whacked out liberal judges to give it to them.
When it happens, Western Civilization has died. And its death won't even have to be arranged by the Islamist terrorists. It will have been accomplished by self-centered homosexual activists and a handful of judges.
Thank God I'm moving.
I am embarassed to say I live in this state.
We have reached this point partly due to the fact that many "CONSERVATIVES" have been working against us on the Constitutional Ammendment making mariage between 1 man and 1 woman. We could have stopped this fiasco if we worked together to pass that in the last congress... Maybe this will wake some folks up.
FReegards,
David
One more time: "Let's make law from the bench!". This will go to the California Supreme Court....eventually.