Better make sure to cover the 10% of men who are red-green colorblind, too!
What shade of green?
I believe the bit you are reffering to is Alamo's point of universality.
She is referring to (correct me if I'm wrong here A-G) the "perfect" green. There are many represnetations of green, though to see it we
a) need to get a shade of green.
and
b) need to place the green on a medium to percieve it.
Care to show us just "green" js?
Not text colored green. Just green.
would you care to enlighten me, so the speak, with an objective definition of green that covers all cases in which people call something green in color?
Whether or not it's possible to give an objective, covering-all-cases definition of a range of experiential qualia -- or even of one such quale -- doesn't really address the question whether such qualia are universals. If that specific shade of green can recur identically in more than one context, it's a universal in the sense in which ontologists use the word. If not -- that is, if two occurrences of what seem to be the exact same color are really two different but 'exactly similar' qualia -- then that specific shade is not a universal. (Most modern nominalists would invoke trope theory or something equivalent at that point.)