[StJacques]

and these laws can be discovered (not invented) through experimentation.

False (and if one claims objectivism is not a blind faith note the internal contradiciton) . . .

Well at least you're honest about it Tribune. ID supporters believe it is scientific to invent the laws of nature. Scientists do not.

And on global warming, I know at least two geologists who will sit down and argue that we are actually entering a cooling phase and they will point to some rather significant evidence to make their point. These same geologists will laugh if anyone argues that there is scientific evidence to contest the Theory of Evolution.

And as to my religious beliefs, I state without reservation that I do believe in God most fervently. I consider my faith to be quite strong in fact. But I reject the notion that the Theory of Evolution undermines that belief in any way. My faith is not threatened by science and never will be.

[MacDorcha]

"And as to my religious beliefs, I state without reservation that I do believe in God most fervently. I consider my faith to be quite strong in fact. But I reject the notion that the Theory of Evolution undermines that belief in any way. My faith is not threatened by science and never will be."

Then we are of one accord, brother. :)

[Tribune7]

ID supporters believe it is scientific to invent the laws of nature.

We do not. We believe that the certainty of explanations posited to explain certain phenomena is weak and is not being defended on scientific grounds but on emotional ones.

In other words laws of nature have not been discovered but invented and we are just objecting.

My faith is not threatened by science

Neither is mine.