Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: b_sharp
Science -- the social structure thereof -- can often act just like any other social structure. Can have a high reactance to change. What allowed plate tectonics to come to be accepted? It did not happen instanteously. What allowed surgeries to become hygienic? It surely wasn't abstract un-emotional science, Dr. Lister was mocked to near insanity!

When did quantum mechanics become accepted? When the older generation of mighty scientists retired (and they were truly mighty -- smart and genius, too).

Social structures can inherit old theories and wrap them in layers of instutionality of all sorts -- people's careers and institutions tied to a given way of looking at the world. They -- as history shows again, and again and again -- become very jealous of a certain way of looking at the world. Not only reactive -- but resistive -- lossey.

55 posted on 03/16/2005 3:17:05 PM PST by bvw (not exactly the answer either ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: bvw
"Social structures can inherit old theories and wrap them in layers of instutionality of all sorts -- people's careers and institutions tied to a given way of looking at the world. They -- as history shows again, and again and again -- become very jealous of a certain way of looking at the world. Not only reactive -- but resistive -- lossey."

That is true to a certain extent, however, the occurrence of resistance to change in the past does not mean it is happening now. It is simply not an argument.

231 posted on 03/18/2005 6:52:08 AM PST by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson