Of course, her parents would claim that Terri had to be "killed" with morphine, because the removal of artificial feeding was not enough.
TROLL BE GONE
thanks for stopping by Mister Felos /sarcasm>
If they actually go through with this goulish act, then the husband and that idiot judge should be made to sit at her bedside the entire time she agonizes through starvation.
I'm not sure what you mean here. Do you mean that Terri's parents want her killed? That's a ludicrous position if indeed that's what you're saying.
In 2003, when her parents were concerned about the morphine drip, they were concerned that she might die from the morphine. Their concern wasn't that she was going to "die sooner", their concern was that she was going to die, period! Morphine can kill on its own, as I'm sure you're aware.
So to say: 1. Terri's parents would ask that morphine would be given, is rediculous. 2. That Terri's parents don't want morphine given, because that might kill her quicker, that's true I'm sure. But it's not like her parents want to deny morphine to her, so that she will suffer more, it's that they simply don't want to see her die!
# 27 If Terry is given morphine, she won't feel a thing."
That does not alter the fact that this will be a long and tortuous 10-to 15 days as the horrendous effects of starvation and dehydration take their toll. If you locked a sick dog in his kennel and abandoned him until he was dead, that would be a crime. How ironic.
If Terri requires morphine, then she isn't PVS, is she?