Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve Van Doorn

"American Laws" must mean those laws and governances actually adopted by the legislature of the US. What the provenance of these laws is is immaterial. They could be originally from Wales, and it wouldn't matter. Once adopted, they are American laws.

Now Phyllis is recommending impeachment for use of foreign laws - meaning those laws and governances NOT adopted by the legislature of the US, but other legislatures (and not necessarily currently existing legislatures)

Some posters are getting a bit hung up on where America got its laws from. Doesn't matter. What matters is what laws it has adopted - those are what the courts should be judging, and are the only things that fall within their competence. Phyllis is onto something - if its possible to impeach a President for doing his job badly (and it is), then it's certainly possible to impeach a judge.


55 posted on 03/16/2005 12:23:41 PM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: agere_contra

But in this case it was influnced not taken directly from foreign law.


56 posted on 03/16/2005 12:27:59 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: agere_contra
American Laws" must mean those laws and governances actually adopted by the legislature of the US. What the provenance of these laws is is immaterial. They could be originally from Wales, and it wouldn't matter. Once adopted, they are American laws.

Now Phyllis is recommending impeachment for use of foreign laws - meaning those laws and governances NOT adopted by the legislature of the US, but other legislatures (and not necessarily currently existing legislatures)

Some posters are getting a bit hung up on where America got its laws from. Doesn't matter. What matters is what laws it has adopted - those are what the courts should be judging, and are the only things that fall within their competence. Phyllis is onto something - if its possible to impeach a President for doing his job badly (and it is), then it's certainly possible to impeach a judge.

Well said.

78 posted on 03/16/2005 12:57:01 PM PST by Bluegrass Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: agere_contra
There's really no requirement at all to impeach a judge. The President would appear to have all the authority he needs to simply relieve a judge at any time.

Thomas Jefferson did that to half the federal judiciary.

98 posted on 03/16/2005 3:43:49 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson