Skip to comments.
Bill aims to give police moral powers
http://www.news-journalonline.com/ ^
| 3 17 05
| JIM HAUG and VIRGINIA SMITH
Posted on 03/17/2005 7:24:16 AM PST by freepatriot32
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
To: balch3
A much needed small step in the right direction toward decency.
-Eric
41
posted on
03/18/2005 7:23:01 AM PST
by
E Rocc
To: E Rocc
"Indecency" in a nonpublic place falls under the MYOB category. BTTT.
Nobody is forced to go to a strip club or swinger party. If what goes on in such nonpublic settings isn't your thing, spend your time elsewhere.
42
posted on
03/18/2005 7:40:00 AM PST
by
Modernman
("They're not people, they're hippies!"- Cartman)
To: Modernman
Uh, again, I support local legislation that would prohibit people from screwing on public beaches so that children won't accidentally walk up and inadvertently view the spectacle. Do we really have to insist that someone complains about public sex acts before the cops put a stop to it?
43
posted on
03/18/2005 8:25:48 PM PST
by
beeler
(Shoot first, ask questions later.)
To: Teacher317
Maybe not a perfect comparison, but the idea can be applied to any situation. Take prostitution or drug dealing for example.
44
posted on
03/18/2005 8:29:31 PM PST
by
beeler
(Shoot first, ask questions later.)
To: traviskicks
"Who sets morals? God or Government?" Most of them, rather than having been set from the top down, are probably set through evolution...they just evolve, I think.
45
posted on
03/18/2005 8:33:13 PM PST
by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: beeler
Daytona Beach Police Sgt. Al Tolley said existing laws have been sufficient for his department to deal with lewd behavior in public places. In the case of the couple having sex on the beach, he said they could have been charged for being in the public view. The law would have a greater impact in places like strip clubs. Again the laws are there for public places. The religious police now want to be permitted to control private behavioure in non-public places.
46
posted on
03/19/2005 8:30:18 PM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
(Conservatives wish to preserve existing evils. Liberals want to replace them with new ones)
To: Oztrich Boy
Of course, I agree that the laws should be limited to public places, but some of our more capital "L"ibertarian friends would insist that anything should go in any instance.
47
posted on
03/20/2005 4:46:50 PM PST
by
beeler
(Shoot first, ask questions later.)
To: Oztrich Boy; All
48
posted on
03/24/2005 8:42:35 AM PST
by
freepatriot32
(Jacques Chirac and Kofi Annan, a pantomime horse in which both men are playing the rear end. M.Steyn)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson