Posted on 03/17/2005 7:33:14 AM PST by booksaver
You don't think that any of it has gone to Terri's bills from the past 12 years?
When the money is gone, Michael's phoney friends, the judge and the laywer, will no longer remember his name.
Well, you got it half right. All the money ismostly gone. But it sure didn't go for any rehab or care. That all ended when Mikey deposited the check in 1992. Here is an accounting of the funds(including pre-payment of her cremation with Greer's blessing from funds that were intended for her rehab):
Summary of expenses paid from Terris 1.2 Million Dollar medical trust fund (jury awarded 1992) | ||||||||||
NOTE: In his November 1993 Petition Schiavo alleges the 1993 guardianship asset balance as $761,507.50
|
After 11 years of interference with carrying out his wifes request her husband has been forced into a lifestyle that he wouldn't have gone to had he been allowed to carry out her wishes.
This is Michael's $400,000 house, complete with an oval pool in the back yard. He and his "fiancee" have his and her Mercedes. All this on a nurses salary??? What a tough lifestyle to be "forced" into, wouldn't you say??
Well, that's just an impossible burden on our health system and on our budget. My point is life and death decisions are made for a variety of reasons. It's unreasonable to think that the US can keep everyone alive no matter the cost.
If Terri's funds would have been used properly and she lived at home where those who are disabled usually do live her financial independance would not be an issue.
Homecare is better and more economical then nursing homes.
I recently learned that in our State of Oregon most severly disabled careproviders in home recieve $1200.00 to $2000.00 dollars and healthcare needs are covered by the State.
So Michael only received $10,000? So what's his motivation in this? And please don't give me the "he wants to murder her because she'll one day wake up and tell the world he tried to kill her." That doesn't fly because for the first five years he tried everything, in front of everybody, to make her better. What's his motivation? It's not money....
Yes you can do g tube feedings at home no problem also many home health care medical needs can be done at home and much better than in a facility with umpteen people just "doing a job".
Don't get me wrong there are those who care about the needs of their patients in these facilities but you also have drones that are clueless also.
I know personally the having someone come in twice a week for 9hrs for my respite is hard as they have to be constantly breifed on daily care needs.
My son had to temp. stay in a facility when I was by emergency hospitalized for a week and the care, even though I supplied all his medical supplies, sucked. Imagine no one changing his g tube stoma site pad for days at a time when normally I do it twice a day to keep the site healthy. Could lost the site meaning major surgery to put in a new one due to infection. The list goes on how half ass the care was, it is a small town and people reported back to me first hand.
I changed my diet and pay more attention to my health so that will never be an issue so help me God.
Terri could be at home or in a group home for the disabled that is sooo much better.
Unbelievable! HINO got $2.25 million from the lawsuit! And this lawyer says it was only $700,000 and $500,000 went to her and that slime (felos). Where did the rest of Terri's funds go? Something really stinks bigtime! God Bless terri and her family and save them from this HINO and Partners in Torture and Death.How many others have been tortured and murdered there?
There are group homes that are a great alternative.
They have only 4 or so disabled clients and it is not mixed with different types of those needing care.
Others with her same type of disabilities would be there.
I hope that she lives to take advantage of that alternative.
So what's to stop everyone who has an illness to come here for the free health care?
Again, you are in the extremes. I am not "shilling" for socialism. I have seen the abuses of that system in the world and see how it saps the creative energy and will to achieve out of the individual. I have seen how it increases poverty, not decrease it. I am simply advocating helping the helpless.
No, the judge and the lawyer are ideological euthanazis.
Where in my post did I say any of that?? I was addressing the subject of the article. Terri is unlawfully on Medicaid while her "husband" lives in a $400,000 home and owns 2 luxury cars. I can't find what I want right now to back it up but I believe the $10,000 listed there is reimbursement for the prepaid cremation.
No one is arguing that EVERYONE should be alive. The argument is that this woman has been declared to be in a Persistent Vegetative State, and it simply is not true. THAT is why her parents want to keep her alive. No one knows how much therapy will help, they would simply like to see it tried. Instead of this constant drumbeat of kill her, kill her, kill her.
And yes, we believe that food and water for otherwise healthy but disabled individuals is NOT extraordinary heroic measures, but simply the respect one should have for a DOG much less a human being.
My Mom lived in a group home the last few years of her life and she had a lot more fun than the few years preceding it.
You are overgeneralizing again. Not everyone qualifies for Medicaid. It is health care for the neediest among us. That is all. There are millions of Americans (and immigrants) who are able to work and make a living but who do not have health care insurance for various reasons nor do they qualify for Medicaid and there is no help for them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.