Skip to comments.
Book Reveals: New York Times Buried Holocaust News
http://www.israelnationalnews.com ^
| Mar 14, '05
| www.israelnationalnews.com
Posted on 03/17/2005 10:58:10 PM PST by deepFR
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
NYT wrong then, and wrong today.
1
posted on
03/17/2005 10:58:11 PM PST
by
deepFR
To: deepFR
2
posted on
03/17/2005 10:59:56 PM PST
by
nopardons
To: deepFR
As much as prominent Jewish leftists want to deny it, most Jews, at least the ones I know, HATE and BOYCOTT the NYT. Yes, we believe in a liberal media too.
The NYT used to be Republican at one point.
3
posted on
03/17/2005 11:02:10 PM PST
by
LoudAmericanCowboy
(''If the president just does more of the same every day... I may be handed Lebanon..."-Jean Francois)
To: deepFR
I wonder what is said in the book about the "influence" of the FDR administration on what most newspapers printed?
4
posted on
03/17/2005 11:04:24 PM PST
by
leadpenny
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: deepFR
Haven't we had enough of this Holocaust crap?
How many damn memorials do we need?
The Holocaust has been franchised to the point that it should be renamed McMassacre.
It has now become a pathetic, generic symbol of "man's inhumanity to man" with the Jewish experience during that sick period slowly sinking into the muddle of McVictimization.
The Holocaust is becoming a shield in which modern day Jew haters can defend themselves from claims of Anti-Semitism while bashing the Jews at the same time.
6
posted on
03/17/2005 11:14:22 PM PST
by
zarf
To: zarf
Actually this shows a pattern from the NYT, Didn't they also cover up the Stalin purges of the Kulaks in the 20's and 30's and the Rwanda problems in the nineties.
Do you see a pattern here.
7
posted on
03/17/2005 11:19:48 PM PST
by
dts32041
(When did the Democratic party stop being the political arm of the KKK?)
To: dts32041
Yep, continuing right up to the present day... Sudanese genocide news, back pages, obscuring the Islamic character of it in every story. Covering up for despotic regimes the world 'round, that should be the new slogan for the NY Times.
8
posted on
03/17/2005 11:25:34 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(Sick already of premature speculation on the 2008 race)
To: zarf
Um, wow. I didn't realize all those people weren't worth remembering. Okay, we can all just forget about it now. No big deal. Thank you for putting it all into perspective. /sarcasm
9
posted on
03/17/2005 11:29:23 PM PST
by
BykrBayb
(5 minutes of prayer for Terri, every day at 11 am EDT, until she's safe. http://www.terrisfight.org)
To: Yehuda
"Holocaust news was consistently relegated to the Times' back pages. Of the 1,186 articles that the Times published during 1939-1945 about Europe's Jews, only 26 (about two percent) of them appeared on the front page, and even those articles "obscured the fact that most of the victims were Jews."
This is unbelievable in context with how just about every day for the past 20 years, the Times features a FRONT PAGE column of the plight of some allegedly mistreated ethnic minority.
This has been an unabashedly anti-Semitic paper for 60 years. And, incredibly, it is gobbled up by most liberal Jews in New York City. Amazing!
10
posted on
03/17/2005 11:30:29 PM PST
by
Zivasmate
(" A wise man's heart inclines him to his right, but a fool's heart to his left." - Ecclesiastes 10)
To: zarf
Haven't we had enough of this Holocaust crap? In general or what happened in the 30s and 40s in particular?
To: leadpenny
In general or what happened in the 30s and 40s in particular? The 30's and 40's in particular.
12
posted on
03/17/2005 11:56:16 PM PST
by
zarf
To: zarf
Haven't we had enough of this Holocaust crap? No we haven't.
13
posted on
03/18/2005 12:07:38 AM PST
by
bad company
(Stupid SHOULD hurt)
To: deepFR
What a profound example of how a paper can direct events by what it prints, and what is suppresses!
14
posted on
03/18/2005 12:20:09 AM PST
by
Enterprise
(President George W. Bush - the leading insurgent detergent.)
To: dts32041
Yes, they did cover up those purges. The specific reporters name was Walter Duranty; he hailed the success of Stalin's collective agriculture in the Ukraine while the people there starved from a man-made famine. Kulaks was a name given to private farmers who'd been modestly successful. Stalin simply called all who disagreed with collectivism Kulaks. Also, he meant to suppress Ukrainian nationalism. This is one of the great untold stories of Soviet history, at least not told well to the general public. It's almost as poorly known as Operation Keel Haul where US and UK forces delivered hundreds of thousands of captured Russian prisoners after WW II to Stalin against the wishes of the prisoners. These prisoners were often shot within hearing distance of the US and UK forces who delivered them. Others went to the Gulag. Few survived.
15
posted on
03/18/2005 4:08:50 AM PST
by
elhombrelibre
(Hezbollah will disarm before we see Kerry sign his SF 180,)
To: zarf
I don't know what we gain by forgetting any of the enormous crimes inflicted on people. If it's a subject you have no interest in, no one will force you to pay attention. Surely you don't expect the survivors to not commemorate those they lost, do you?
16
posted on
03/18/2005 4:11:06 AM PST
by
elhombrelibre
(Hezbollah will disarm before we see Kerry sign his SF 180,)
To: Alouette
17
posted on
03/18/2005 6:51:29 AM PST
by
elhombrelibre
(Hezbollah will disarm before we see Kerry sign his SF 180,)
To: zarf; 1bigdictator; 1st-P-In-The-Pod; 2sheep; A Jovial Cad; A_Conservative_in_Cambridge; ...
Haven't we had enough of this Holocaust crap? How many damn memorials do we need? The Holocaust has been franchised to the point that it should be renamed McMassacre.
The appropriate way to memorialize the Holocaust is not by building museums, but by building schools, synagogues and yeshivos so that the next generation of Jewish people will be firm in their faith and observance. Not another freakin damn shrine to the dead.
Anti-Semites love Holocaust memorials. They look at the exhibits featuring piles of dead Jews and feel great satisfaction.
FRmail me to be added or removed from this Judaic/pro-Israel ping list.
WARNING: This is a high volume ping list
18
posted on
03/18/2005 7:04:44 AM PST
by
Alouette
(Learned Mother of Zion)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
19
posted on
03/18/2005 7:13:07 AM PST
by
SJackson
(Be careful -- with quotations, you can damn anything, Andre Malraux)
To: bad company
Holocaust crap ???
No. We respect and honour our dead.
20
posted on
03/18/2005 7:41:47 AM PST
by
FreeReporting
(Middle of the road Israeli)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson