Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Petronski

Do you think that this whole controversy about whether or not to starve Terry Schiavo to death has two sides that are roughly equivalent to the sides taken over abortion? It seems like it's the abortion enthusiasts who want to see Terri slowly, grotesquely killed by starvation and the pro-lifers who want to see Terry protected. (Okay - - duh! OF COURSE pro-lifers want to see Terri protected.)


202 posted on 03/19/2005 12:20:31 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: Lancey Howard

Yes. I'm guessing that either they fear some specific threat to the "right" to abortion arising from this case, or they just want to spite pro-lifers.


213 posted on 03/19/2005 12:22:46 PM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

To: Lancey Howard

Sure looks that way.


214 posted on 03/19/2005 12:22:58 PM PST by RightWhale (Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

To: Lancey Howard
Actually there are numerous pro-choic people who also have come out in favor of keeping Terri alive. Terri's case has implications that go beyond these issues.
217 posted on 03/19/2005 12:23:29 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

To: Lancey Howard

Yes I do.

The shorthand I've been using is "death cult."



I'm sure there are exceptions, but the pattern is obvious.


228 posted on 03/19/2005 12:26:22 PM PST by Petronski (If 'Judge' Greer can kill Terri, who will be next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson