Posted on 03/19/2005 9:09:11 PM PST by metalmanx2j
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - On American Indian reservations, some tribes are debating whether they should embrace gay marriage or shun such unions as an affront to family values.
The controversy in these often-ignored sovereign territories within the United States comes as Americans in general are divided, often bitterly, over same-sex weddings. The controversy made headlines again this week as a judge ruled that California's ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional.
"What goes on in Indian nations now is a microcosm of what is going on across the country," said David Cornsilk, a Cherokee representing two lesbians in the most prominent case before an American Indian court.
The latest California ruling also came weeks after a legislator in Navajo Nation, the largest and most populous Indian reservation, called for a ban on gay marriage.
Scholars of homosexuality in Indian culture say Native Americans traditionally tolerated gay behavior, an attitude that shifted after the Europeans arrived in North America.
"American Indians firmly believe from forever that procreation was essential for survival, but you could play with anybody," said Lester Brown, author of "Two Spirit People: American Indian Lesbian Women and Gay Men."
"Christianity ruined a lot of it," said Brown, a Cherokee. "The religious groups that were trying to proselytize with the Indians could not accept those different people."
GAY CASE BEFORE CHEROKEE COURT
Brown's tribe is engaged in a court fight parallel to those taking place in California and elsewhere in the nation. The Cherokee case arose after a lesbian couple obtained a tribal marriage application last year, only to have the Cherokee Nation ban gay marriage and refuse to recognize the union.
Cornsilk, who will argue the case before the Cherokee's top court, said the California decision could paradoxically make his efforts to win acceptance more difficult because of conservative sentiment in the American Midwest.
"All of the effect all of these cases have had is to simply calcify resistance," he said by telephone from Tulsa, Oklahoma. "They see both sides of the country, both the East and West Coast, as liberal and not representative of mainstream America."
Voters in many U.S. states have recently approved measures against gay marriage, while one state, Massachusetts, became the only U.S. state to allow same-sex marriage last year.
Cornsilk, who is gay, said historical documents suggest a group of Indian men married each other in 1825. The Cherokee Tribal Council will hold a hearing on the issue on March 24, he said.
In Navajo Nation in the Southwest, the proposal to ban gay marriage has sparked a flurry of letters to the editor in the local Navajo Times newspaper.
"Like all indigenous tribes and ancient civilizations, homosexuality is a third gender, and marriage was for everyone," Collestipher Chatto wrote. "But sadly, many of the Dine (Navajo) people are corrupted by the Western beliefs and Christianity, causing many natives to view gays as perverted or sodomites."
Robert Williams, a University of Arizona professor of law and American Indian studies, said as sovereign nations tribes can set their own family rules, so they could ban or allow gay marriage.
"I've heard proposals going both ways," said Williams, who also serves as a supreme court justice for two tribes. In family law "state law cannot apply, will not apply."
Joe Shirley Jr., president of the 300,000-strong Navajo Nation, took a cautious approach when asked about the issue at a press conference in Window Rock, Arizona last week.
"I don't think it is an issue to be handled on the part of the administration, it's a people issue," he said. "If anything is going to be had about gay marriages here in Navajo Land, give it to the people, let the people decide on what the stance is going to be on like-people marriages."
The Navajo people recently approved casino gambling in a voter referendum.
Some U.S. politicians say constituents have lobbied them to urge local tribes to permit gay marriage.
"I had quite a few people call me and say, 'Why don't you talk to the tribes about that,"' Ron Oden, the openly gay mayor of Palm Springs, California, told Reuters.
Yet he did not expect tribes would quickly extend such recognition as they are already fighting a public relations battle over the growth of Indian casinos. "The last things the tribes want is to get more controversy," Oden said.
They cant wait for the spring ducks soon to arrive. Tired of livin off rabbits they snare for half the winter I think. Salmon, caribou, moose, then back to snowshoes and ducks; yearly cycle. But ya know, as long as they can eat what they catch and be left alone; they are happier than most of us white guys with all our toys; no joke.
ROTFLMAO I wonder if the 'Indian' culture would agree?
Next we will be hearing that Sitting Bull was a teepee(no closets) homosexual -another famous homosexual like Alexander & Abraham Lincoln...
These scholars are simply homosexual activists -the same genre of scholar that suggest homosexuality was historically accepted as 'normal' and has only recently been condemned by fascist religious zealot homophobes.
"White man look kinda cute in leather boots"
"You thinkum me got too much war paint?"
"No likeum Oglala people. Don't know how to accessorize!"
I just can't see this, people...
Actually, from my limited readings of Indian culture, homosexuality or at least role-swapping was not looked upon as any big deal. If one found one's place in Indian society and was a productive member, that's what mattered.
I'm not advocating it, but that's what I understood.
Indian gay casinos up next........
The Lone Ranger and Tonto are in trouble now.......
"Scholars of homosexuality" is nothing but a code word for campus homosexual activist. In reality they aren't scholarly at all--scholarly on the level of "scholar" Ward Churchill.
Homo propaganda?I agree.You and i see it as propaganda,but this(article)will be accepted as historical fact at "esteemed" colleges and universities throughout the US.
From my mothers side, having not one, but two tribes of Indian blood running through my veins (Osage and Kaw) I consider this a disgraceful and dishonest smear of all American Indians.
I may have to get out my war paint if they persist. :-)
I question the validity as well.Keep in mind that tribes throughout the US are going to vote on whether to acknowledge homosexual unions or not,and now an "article" just happens to appear saying Indians accepted homosexuality before the white man came?Very convenient,don't you think?
Wouldn't it be great if this got outed on Fox?Do kind of a Ward Churchill expose.BTW,One so called "scholar" doesn't speak for all Indians:)
I think what I'll do is forward this article to my tribes council and ask them what their stance is on the issue. I wouldn't be suprised if they hadn't heard of this since Oklahoma and Kansas are a long ways from San Francisco (and not just geographicaly), but I'd be even more suprised if they were for it???
I'll remind them that they are elected and can be replaced if that is the case. :-)
While homosexuality on the side was not really taboo in many Indian cultures, I've never heard of an Indian tribe with anything but heterosexual marriage. Conflating tolerance of homosexual behavior with supporting homosexual marriage is a rather gross flaw in reasoning.
This is just stupid - Leftists stirring up more hatred and divisiveness. Even back when AIM was big on the rez's, Homos were not held in any high esteem.
But what the heck, this is just another story which will give FReepers plenty of opportunity to have fun bashing indians, just because of some sick twisted leftists... Sigh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.