Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boardwalk

Actually, the law does not call for the reinsertion of Terri's feeding tube - it calls for a Federal judicial review of her case to see if any violation of her due process rights have been violated, and the law assumes the judge will reinsert the tube as she has to be alive for the case to be reviewed. It also will be in the same court in Florida, but will be handled by a Federal judge in that court. At least that is how I am understanding this law, but I could be mistaken.


19 posted on 03/20/2005 2:08:06 PM PST by Texas Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Deb

Should be the bill - not law yet.


21 posted on 03/20/2005 2:11:04 PM PST by Texas Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Deb

That's my understanding, too.


62 posted on 03/20/2005 2:51:17 PM PST by skr (May God bless those in harm's way and confound those who would do the harming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Deb
Actually, the law does not call for the reinsertion of Terri's feeding tube - it calls for a Federal judicial review of her case

Has anyone seen the text of the bill? Some stories today said the compromise was to make sure it only applied to Terri and no one else (how do you spell "Bill of Attainder"?). It would be nice to know how they kept from invalidating my durable power of attorney which is designed, like millions of others, to keep me from being force fed and diapered for years as poor Terri has been -- and apparently will be for years to come. How tragic for her.

108 posted on 03/20/2005 4:20:55 PM PST by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson