Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Astronomical surprise: Massive old galaxies starve to death in the infant universe
Carnegie Institution of Washington ^ | 10 March 2005 | Staff

Posted on 03/21/2005 7:00:41 AM PST by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
There was an earlier thread somewhat related to this, but the current article has more information:
Surprise Discovery in the Early Universe [earliest known massive cluster of galaxies].
1 posted on 03/21/2005 7:00:42 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
Science Ping! An elite subset of the Evolution list.
See list's description in my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added/dropped.

2 posted on 03/21/2005 7:02:09 AM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
"...Their existence was not predicted by theory and it pushes back the formation epoch of some of the most massive galaxies we see today."

Well, back to the old drawing board...

3 posted on 03/21/2005 7:06:11 AM PST by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Yet another observation that doesn't fit into the big bang model. Add that to the super giant galaxy spiral galaxy that is some 80 times the size of the Milkyway, Galaxy structure, galaxy cluster motion. And a lot more that I can't remember.


4 posted on 03/21/2005 7:09:48 AM PST by biblewonk (Neither was the man created for woman but the woman for the man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
“We are really amazed — these are the earliest, oldest galaxies found to date. Their existence was not predicted by theory and it pushes back the formation epoch of some of the most massive galaxies we see today."

Darwin Central will be upset. Somebody forgot to supress a jarring data point.

5 posted on 03/21/2005 7:10:56 AM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
How big is a "red giant" star? I believe that if our Sun had Beatlegues' diameter we would be inside the star.
6 posted on 03/21/2005 7:12:48 AM PST by sandydipper (Less government is best government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Wow...the universe rocks!

Once again I have to step back from all the 'mundane' posts and just boggle at the enormity of everything and think how cool it is to take part for an instant.


7 posted on 03/21/2005 7:16:43 AM PST by johnmilken (75% of my posts are proved wrong within 10 minutes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Darwin Central will be upset. Somebody forgot to supress a jarring data point.

What the anti-science posters still don't understand -- and probably never will -- is that scientists love it when stuff like this is observed. It's an opportunity to learn more about the universe, and to improve their theories. But we'll be seeing several more posts to the effect that this is some kind of a disaster, which will cause the whole edifice of science to come crashing down.

8 posted on 03/21/2005 7:19:45 AM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Isn't God AWESOME!!! We can't even begin to imagine the totality of what He spoke into existence in order that we might exist as we do. If His universe is any indication, I find it easy to believe that living with Him in Eternity will not grow old or stale, but be a continuous delight.


9 posted on 03/21/2005 7:22:08 AM PST by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

bttt


10 posted on 03/21/2005 7:24:16 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Notice that none of the scientists came right out and said.

"We were wrong"

11 posted on 03/21/2005 7:24:16 AM PST by Centurion2000 (Nations do not survive by setting examples for others. Nations survive by making examples of others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandydipper
How big is a "red giant" star? I believe that if our Sun had Beatlegues' diameter we would be inside the star.

Right.

At its most likely distance of 425 light years, its measured angular diameter yields a radius 630 times that of the Sun, 2.9 astronomical units. If placed at the Sun, the star would go 55% of the way to the orbit of the planet Jupiter. The star is so large that it is the first ever actually directly imaged as a disk from Earth (by the Hubble Space Telescope).
From this website: BETELGEUSE (Alpha Orionis).
12 posted on 03/21/2005 7:24:30 AM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
They had rapidly formed massive amounts of stars out of gas much earlier in the universe's history, but then suddenly starved to death, ...

Did Judge Greer make another ruling?

13 posted on 03/21/2005 7:25:59 AM PST by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
But we'll be seeing several more posts to the effect that this is some kind of a disaster, which will cause the whole edifice of science to come crashing down.

It was just a house of cards you know. Now it's all collapsed, all an illusion. Perhaps my car won't start or my computer won't boot up. It's only a coincidence they've been working so far. We're melting away! Melting away! What a world!

14 posted on 03/21/2005 7:28:10 AM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Thanks for the ping!


15 posted on 03/21/2005 7:28:58 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Judge Greer's fault.

Reinsert the feeding tube.


16 posted on 03/21/2005 7:29:00 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
"...Their existence was not predicted by theory and it pushes back the formation epoch of some of the most massive galaxies we see today."Well, back to the old drawing board..."

FACTS change? Facts changes our outlook? No dumbocrats in this field of study ..that's for sure!

17 posted on 03/21/2005 7:35:44 AM PST by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sandydipper
How big is a "red giant" star? I believe that if our Sun had Beatlegues' diameter we would be inside the star.

Antares would swallow up Mars. Of course red giants have another nickname as well, Red-hot vaccuum.

18 posted on 03/21/2005 7:36:56 AM PST by Centurion2000 (Nations do not survive by setting examples for others. Nations survive by making examples of others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Betelgeuse was always one of my favorite stars to watch on the 4-8 watch when I was working the Hawaiian waters. When out at sea and miles away from artificial light sources its true magnificence shows. It changes from red to yellow to blue through the spectrum as it “twinkles”, a truly awesome beacon in the sky.


19 posted on 03/21/2005 7:40:31 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

starve to death in the infant universe

Mind control Auschwitz agenda ping
20 posted on 03/21/2005 7:57:40 AM PST by Truth666 (http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson