Skip to comments.
Astronomical surprise: Massive old galaxies starve to death in the infant universe
Carnegie Institution of Washington ^
| 10 March 2005
| Staff
Posted on 03/21/2005 7:00:41 AM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
Science Ping! |
An elite subset of the Evolution list. |
See list's description in my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added/dropped. |
|
|
|
2
posted on
03/21/2005 7:02:09 AM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
"...Their existence was not predicted by theory and it pushes back the formation epoch of some of the most massive galaxies we see today." Well, back to the old drawing board...
3
posted on
03/21/2005 7:06:11 AM PST
by
Junior
(FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
To: PatrickHenry
Yet another observation that doesn't fit into the big bang model. Add that to the super giant galaxy spiral galaxy that is some 80 times the size of the Milkyway, Galaxy structure, galaxy cluster motion. And a lot more that I can't remember.
4
posted on
03/21/2005 7:09:48 AM PST
by
biblewonk
(Neither was the man created for woman but the woman for the man.)
To: PatrickHenry
We are really amazed these are the earliest, oldest galaxies found to date. Their existence was not predicted by theory and it pushes back the formation epoch of some of the most massive galaxies we see today." Darwin Central will be upset. Somebody forgot to supress a jarring data point.
5
posted on
03/21/2005 7:10:56 AM PST
by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: PatrickHenry
How big is a "red giant" star? I believe that if our Sun had Beatlegues' diameter we would be inside the star.
6
posted on
03/21/2005 7:12:48 AM PST
by
sandydipper
(Less government is best government!)
To: PatrickHenry
Wow...the universe rocks!
Once again I have to step back from all the 'mundane' posts and just boggle at the enormity of everything and think how cool it is to take part for an instant.
7
posted on
03/21/2005 7:16:43 AM PST
by
johnmilken
(75% of my posts are proved wrong within 10 minutes...)
To: VadeRetro
Darwin Central will be upset. Somebody forgot to supress a jarring data point. What the anti-science posters still don't understand -- and probably never will -- is that scientists love it when stuff like this is observed. It's an opportunity to learn more about the universe, and to improve their theories. But we'll be seeing several more posts to the effect that this is some kind of a disaster, which will cause the whole edifice of science to come crashing down.
8
posted on
03/21/2005 7:19:45 AM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
Isn't God AWESOME!!! We can't even begin to imagine the totality of what He spoke into existence in order that we might exist as we do. If His universe is any indication, I find it easy to believe that living with Him in Eternity will not grow old or stale, but be a continuous delight.
9
posted on
03/21/2005 7:22:08 AM PST
by
trebb
("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
To: PatrickHenry
10
posted on
03/21/2005 7:24:16 AM PST
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: PatrickHenry
Notice that none of the scientists came right out and said.
"We were wrong"
11
posted on
03/21/2005 7:24:16 AM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Nations do not survive by setting examples for others. Nations survive by making examples of others)
To: sandydipper
How big is a "red giant" star? I believe that if our Sun had Beatlegues' diameter we would be inside the star. Right.
At its most likely distance of 425 light years, its measured angular diameter yields a radius 630 times that of the Sun, 2.9 astronomical units. If placed at the Sun, the star would go 55% of the way to the orbit of the planet Jupiter. The star is so large that it is the first ever actually directly imaged as a disk from Earth (by the Hubble Space Telescope).
From this website:
BETELGEUSE (Alpha Orionis).
12
posted on
03/21/2005 7:24:30 AM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
They had rapidly formed massive amounts of stars out of gas much earlier in the universe's history, but then suddenly starved to death, ...Did Judge Greer make another ruling?
13
posted on
03/21/2005 7:25:59 AM PST
by
shekkian
To: PatrickHenry
But we'll be seeing several more posts to the effect that this is some kind of a disaster, which will cause the whole edifice of science to come crashing down. It was just a house of cards you know. Now it's all collapsed, all an illusion. Perhaps my car won't start or my computer won't boot up. It's only a coincidence they've been working so far. We're melting away! Melting away! What a world!
14
posted on
03/21/2005 7:28:10 AM PST
by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: PatrickHenry
To: PatrickHenry
Judge Greer's fault.
Reinsert the feeding tube.
16
posted on
03/21/2005 7:29:00 AM PST
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
To: Junior
"...Their existence was not predicted by theory and it pushes back the formation epoch of some of the most massive galaxies we see today."Well, back to the old drawing board..."
FACTS change? Facts changes our outlook? No dumbocrats in this field of study ..that's for sure!
17
posted on
03/21/2005 7:35:44 AM PST
by
litehaus
To: sandydipper
How big is a "red giant" star? I believe that if our Sun had Beatlegues' diameter we would be inside the star. Antares would swallow up Mars. Of course red giants have another nickname as well, Red-hot vaccuum.
18
posted on
03/21/2005 7:36:56 AM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Nations do not survive by setting examples for others. Nations survive by making examples of others)
To: PatrickHenry
Betelgeuse was always one of my favorite stars to watch on the 4-8 watch when I was working the Hawaiian waters. When out at sea and miles away from artificial light sources its true magnificence shows. It changes from red to yellow to blue through the spectrum as it twinkles, a truly awesome beacon in the sky.
19
posted on
03/21/2005 7:40:31 AM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: PatrickHenry
starve to death in the infant universe
Mind control Auschwitz agenda ping
20
posted on
03/21/2005 7:57:40 AM PST
by
Truth666
(http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson