Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No winners in Schiavo case
theaustralian.news.com.au ^ | March 22, 2005 | Doug Bandow

Posted on 03/21/2005 8:16:09 AM PST by Destro

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: frgoff
life-support system: the equipment used to keep a person alive when they are very ill or injured
41 posted on 03/21/2005 9:10:19 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
Michael Schiavo made a big big mistake challenging President Bush.

They are going to go through his finances with a fine tooth comb.

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

42 posted on 03/21/2005 9:13:26 AM PST by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trisham
If you can pay for that right it seems: Ironically, while governor of Texas, Bush signed into law a bill allowing hospitals to end life support if the patient had no means to pay for further care, and further care was thought to be futile.
43 posted on 03/21/2005 9:15:28 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: expatguy

Dear expatguy,

I hope you're right, but I'm not optimistic.

My (cynical) view is that the Republican Congress and President Bush are doing just enough to pacify their social conservative base. They will lay down and play dead when the courts rule against them, and say, "We did all we could do."

If it were otherwise, the murdering greer would be in shackles right now.


sitetest


44 posted on 03/21/2005 9:16:24 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: senorita

A lot of people are afraid of dying. I guess I'm just more of a wuss, cause I'd rather not suffer physically, I'd just rather go on to something better.


45 posted on 03/21/2005 9:17:17 AM PST by senorita (A real American native)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

Speaking of Tiblisi and utilities --- keep a window open when heating your room.


46 posted on 03/21/2005 9:18:20 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: senorita

Hmm. post #45 is weird.


47 posted on 03/21/2005 9:20:42 AM PST by senorita (A real American native)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: tertiary01
I think for PVS it can be argued that the spirit/soul has departed - I feel that way but I don't wat to imose this on others. The problem/issue here is that the decision rests with the husband and the husband made a decision that the parents of the victim are against. FLorida law as upheld by the Florida court said that A) she is in a PVS as far as the Court is concerend and B) the husband retains his next of kin right to make this call.

That is what it boils down to.

48 posted on 03/21/2005 9:21:52 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Destro

George Bush agrees with you - Ironically, while governor of Texas, Bush signed into law a bill allowing hospitals to end life support if the patient had no means to pay for further care, and further care was thought to be futile


Please site the law in question. I suspect you are just making this up.


49 posted on 03/21/2005 9:24:40 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Next up, US Senate. 60 in 06!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Destro
I think for PVS it can be argued that the spirit/soul has departed

Which would be true is she was in a PVS. Unfortunately for you Cult of Death leftists Terri isn't PVS. She is in a state of reduced metal ability. So what are you going to do next? Argue that anyone with reduced mental ability, Alzheimer's or Autism get wasted? Sorry but you need to get the facts about Terri's case and read up about Hitler's Euthanasia campaign against "Unless Mouths". In your ignorance, you are walking in some pretty awful foot steps. You better beg wathever Gods you beleive in that you never are in a position that you have depend on others to live. You are being weighted in balance right now and have been found wanting
50 posted on 03/21/2005 9:33:41 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Next up, US Senate. 60 in 06!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/HS/content/htm/hs.002.00.000166.00.htm

Read also: Baby at center of life support case dies

Tuesday, March 15, 2005 Posted: 7:39 PM EST (0039 GMT)

"Texas law allows hospitals to end life support in cases such as this but requires that families be given 10 days to find another facility to care for the patient. No hospital was found to take the baby."

51 posted on 03/21/2005 9:35:07 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
"Terri isn't PVS" - Court appointed doctors say otherwise - I know - I know - they lied had an agenda - it's a conspiracy by right to die advocates, the judge was in on the fix.....
52 posted on 03/21/2005 9:37:22 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
By the way - leaving teh Terri case behind - is it only an issue of PVS or not? Because it seems to me we both agree that if she was indeed PVS she should have her feeding tibe removed.

If that is the case let us do a round of tests and if the expersts - really neutral great experts - find she is indeed in a PVS you would ok the removal of the feed tube? Because if they fond her not to be in a PVS I would not want the feeding tube removed at all - that to me is euthanasia and a crimial act.

53 posted on 03/21/2005 9:41:13 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: oilfieldtrash

"To devote so much public resources to someone who is a vegetable is wrong. "
Do you feel the same way about stroke patients, ALS patients, cerebral palsy,etc..?
we could save alot of money


54 posted on 03/21/2005 11:54:58 AM PST by avile (for better or for worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: oilfieldtrash
To devote so much public resources to someone who is a vegetable is wrong.

Her life is over and she wouldnt be living today if it wasnt for the wonders of modern medicine. 15 years in a nursing home. What has she cost the taxpayers.

I've paid for one hell of a lot of stupid stuff in my twenty-plus years of paying taxes. When I compare it with $40 million down the tubes for a computer system my county had to scrap before they even fired it up, it just doesn't sound that bad.

55 posted on 03/21/2005 12:03:25 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Gnome sayin'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson