This thread is intended to examine the U.S. Constitutional questions raised by what Congress did. It's fair to examine what the questions related to the State of Florida, but that would belong on a separate thread.
Did you see the post about the judge asking Terri's parents attorney to present a brief on the constitutionality of this law?
Why is it that people who disagree with you are said to be using emotions (which the need to set aside) and consider the larger constitutional issue? A little arrogant, don't you think? What do you think we're arguing?