Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Terri a person with constitutional rights?
3/23/05 | syriacus

Posted on 03/23/2005 3:20:34 AM PST by syriacus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-143 next last
To: SeanEBoy
If any doctor has any questions regarding treatment for a patient he should: ignore state law; disregard the spouse; ignore the vast majority of expertise and empirical data from his field; petition you and Sean Hannity and his brother-in-law for treatment advice and get Congress involved.

Actually, seeing that there is a lot of dispute over the PVS diagnosis, and that the deciding vote was by a hard-line euthanasia advocate, your statement is exactly what should be done in this case. The on-record doctors for the PVS fact finding were only 3-2 for PVS.

IMO, it is the judge that erred, not the doctors who don't want Terri starved to death.

61 posted on 03/23/2005 4:26:36 AM PST by MortMan (CON is the opposite of PRO. Is Congress therefore the opposite of progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

The wounded in the herd are the easiest to kill. Most herd animals run from their wounded in fear of being attacked themselves. Who will stand and defend this wounded dear girl and show their true humanity. If we all don't learn a big lesson from this tragedy, that it's easy to hide our inhumanity behind the law, then we are doomed as an advanced specie and will consume ourselves like jackals snarling and attacking other jackals just to have a piece of the recent kill.


62 posted on 03/23/2005 4:29:26 AM PST by mict42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify

It's disheartening to see a long-time Freeper side with an obvious disruptor. Yep, calling us "religious nuts" is really a great way to argue.


63 posted on 03/23/2005 4:29:40 AM PST by thecabal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SeanEBoy
The if they commit the sin of murder or pride or both their punishment will come from God and is of no concern to you.

So you say that we have no concern with punshing murderers, since God will take care of them in the afterlife?

64 posted on 03/23/2005 4:31:45 AM PST by thecabal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: SeanEBoy
he should: ignore state law;

Martin Luther King's Letter from Birmingham Jail [excerpts]

We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was "legal" ..." It was "illegal" to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany. [snip]

I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is ... the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action";


65 posted on 03/23/2005 4:33:00 AM PST by syriacus (Cranford says "Terri has no constitutional rights." Then why has she got a "right" to be starved?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
Indeed.

Some of the trouble, is that there is no exact definition of PVS that sharply defines it from the definition of MCS ("minimally concious state"); the two conditions overlap; the views of doctors on the amount of overlap, vary greatly, from doctor to doctor.

Apparently, the law in Florida allows a judge to toss the coin on that boundary, when a decision has to be made, but I would rather that a jury toss the coin --- that there be a trial only on the point of, Is this PVS or MCS?

66 posted on 03/23/2005 4:39:29 AM PST by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: SeanEBoy

"Personal attacks are quite charming."

"you patronizing fool"

Both of these posts come from you. What's up with that? You have the right to personally attack but nobody else does?


67 posted on 03/23/2005 4:41:18 AM PST by tuffydoodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Yes Hannity did a great job but that's not helping Terri this morning.


68 posted on 03/23/2005 4:42:50 AM PST by tutstar ( <{{--->< Impeach Judge Greer http://www.petitiononline.com/ijg520/petition.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
Notice how many of them who harp ceaselessly on an internet forum are leaving their keyboards and going to her aid.

We all do what we can.

Some of us are caring for our frail elderly parents in our homes.

I think it's a good idea for those of us stuck at our keyboards to donate to Terri's foundation.

69 posted on 03/23/2005 4:45:17 AM PST by syriacus (Cranford says "Terri has no constitutional rights." Then why has she got a "right" to be starved?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

...obviously the government nor the courts believe that a human being has any rights unless her/his spouse says so.....


70 posted on 03/23/2005 4:46:29 AM PST by smiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeanEBoy

..."There were seven doctors who have examined Terri and diagnosed her as PVS. You know, licensed physicians that have actually examined her; unlike Hannity's brother, "one of the best radiologists in the country," I'm sure."

Doctors are proven wrong every single day...there are countless miracle stories of individuals who have survived because of the belief if family and friends and who are living today.


71 posted on 03/23/2005 4:48:28 AM PST by smiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
PVS is NOT a medical diagnosis; it is a legal decree that morphs a person into a (nonendangered) plant. Once decreed, this decree is irreversible; no plant ever has transformed itself successfully into a person. Terri looks human, has human genes, acts human, and feels pain as a human; however, she is not a person. "Person" is, as the Supreme Court ruled in Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857), a legal status accorded to some humans (and later, corporations and other entities). In that case, the Court ruled that Dred Scott never could attain personhood because of the color of his skin; instead, he was an animal. (The Constitution allows genetic humans who are not persons to be counted as three-fifths of a person in the Census.)

My solution: have the president decree that Terri participated in José Padilla's conspiracy (however erroneous that must be), send federal law-enforcement agencies to whip the plant from its pot (drab, windowless hospital room), and imprison her in solitary (except doctors and occasional visitors permitted by the guards [which curiously must exclude its owner]) at a military brig.

72 posted on 03/23/2005 4:48:35 AM PST by dufekin (The genocide, terror, communism, and tyranny of the Arab world are falling like dominoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
I would rather that a jury toss the coin --- that there be a trial only on the point of, Is this PVS or MCS?

Interesting.

73 posted on 03/23/2005 4:48:35 AM PST by syriacus (Cranford says "Terri has no constitutional rights." Then why has she got a "right" to be starved?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: thecabal

I didn't call anybody a religious nut, as you well know. I agreed with his/her larger point.


74 posted on 03/23/2005 4:48:46 AM PST by Trust but Verify (Pull up a chair and watch history being made.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SeanEBoy
We live in a society that has constructed courts to handle these types of problems. We do not need to agree, but we need to abide by them. That is the social contract.

We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was "legal" ...It was "illegal" to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany.

Source: Martin Luther King's Letter from Birmingham Jail

75 posted on 03/23/2005 4:52:39 AM PST by syriacus (Cranford says "Terri has no constitutional rights." Then why has she got a "right" to be starved?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: dufekin

Love your way of thinking...


76 posted on 03/23/2005 4:53:55 AM PST by syriacus (Cranford says "Terri has no constitutional rights." Then why has she got a "right" to be starved?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: SeanEBoy
You don't know squat about this case or about the law. Judge Greer based his decision on PVS on the opinions of 5 Doctors, this lunatic being one of them. It is evident to anybody who watched Hannity last night that the guy has an agenda and for considering his opinion valid, Judge Greer should be removed. That's how bad this guy was.

Secondly Florida Law states that a conflict of interest is grounds for removal of the guardian. It's obvious that MS is conflicted, the Florida Court of Appeals admitted as much in their holding.

And the notion that his testimony 8 years after the fact that TS had offered informed consent to be dehydrated to death is as laughable as the American system of jurisprudence has now become.

77 posted on 03/23/2005 4:54:31 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Oh you are so right. I said to my wife yesterday, If Terri and her family are hoping the courts will side with them, she is dead already. Her only hope other than a miracle cure, is for a group of gun toting individuals to steal her from this facility, and take her to a place prepared for long term care, and replace the feeding tube, and of course be prepared for the cost and continuation of hiding someone not easily hidden for the rest of her life. Want to find out how diligent the government would be in returning Terri to a place where her death sentence can be carried out, just try this scenario.


78 posted on 03/23/2005 4:54:57 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify

"Those who want her to live will pick the facts that align with our viewpoint. Those who want to let her go will cherry pick the facts that support their position."


"to live"
"to let her go"

That's a false dichotomy in the Schiavo case. If a person is not terminally ill, then he can't be "let go." He can, however, be euthanized. If a person is not terminally ill, then by definition he is not being sustained by extraordinary means. Defining and establishing food and water as extraordinary means is an immoral and freighteningly dangerous precedent.


79 posted on 03/23/2005 4:55:28 AM PST by macamadamia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: dufekin
If I were the new U.S. Attorney General, I would be preparing to swoop down upon the probate court system of the jurisdiction in question, and seize all documents related to this case and others, in addition to seizing all Terri's medical records and those at the hospice.

There does seem to be a R.I.C.O. case brewing, but I doubt that the AG can act as fast as he'd like, unless he has directed a special task force to see what crimes are being committed.

We may not save Terri, but life is going to get harder for Felos, Greer & Co.

80 posted on 03/23/2005 4:55:33 AM PST by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson