Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jay777
The "intensely personal decision" made by Michael Schiavo, was to deny Terri's wish to die (if we believe his re-statement of her wishes).

He had ample opportunity, in February of 1990, to honor her wish, but he denied her.

He had ample opportunity in March of 1990, to honor her wish, be he denied her.

He repeatedly denied her wish to die, day in, day out, on through 1990. Something that the lynch mob that has supported him, cannot bear to face.

Instead of honoring her wishes, he kept her in suspended animation all through each year of

That is incredible, but the lynch mob has no courage to address his "standard of care."

12 posted on 03/23/2005 5:05:46 AM PST by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: First_Salute

ABSOLUTELY! If this was her wish, why did MS not say so and honor it in the initial stages of her disability? Also, why when fighting for a settlement did he say it was for her rehab and care if he knew all along she was going to have the plug pulled. IF, and that's a big IF, the ACLU were a legitamate organization, they would have some serious issue with Terri's civil liberties being violated by her husband who at best has been inconsistent in his own care for his wife.


70 posted on 03/23/2005 7:01:39 AM PST by cupcakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson