Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bigeasy_70118
Oh, boy. Now I have to go find the federal statute and cite it for you. What you have posted are the congressional rules for finding a witness in contempt, which as I said is different from the federal statute (that's a law, bigeasy) that makes it a felony to interfere.

Give me minute or two.

103 posted on 03/23/2005 10:49:47 AM PST by Defiant (Make unconstitutional rulings unconstitutional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: Defiant
Those aren't the House Rules. It is a paper that outlines Congress' authority with respect to investigative powers. Look at 2 USC 192 and 194.

You need to recognize that the law surrounding legislative is fairly unclear especially with respect to third parties who tamper with evidence and witnesses. I cannot think of situation similar to this one.

125 posted on 03/23/2005 11:07:37 AM PST by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson