To: xzins
BINGO
He could take her into protective custody BECAUSE of the denial of food and water by natural means. It would be his duty as the chief executive to prevent a forcible murder in progress.
He could also arrest her, as you say, as a material witness to an investigation.
To: brigette
Yes.
Or, if there is any dispute over whether an order has been given forbidding the natural ingestion of food and water, he could "oversee" remedy without protective custody.
83 posted on
03/23/2005 10:29:43 AM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson