Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
BINGO

He could take her into protective custody BECAUSE of the denial of food and water by natural means. It would be his duty as the chief executive to prevent a forcible murder in progress.

He could also arrest her, as you say, as a material witness to an investigation.

65 posted on 03/23/2005 10:14:32 AM PST by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: brigette

Yes.

Or, if there is any dispute over whether an order has been given forbidding the natural ingestion of food and water, he could "oversee" remedy without protective custody.


83 posted on 03/23/2005 10:29:43 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson