Posted on 03/24/2005 4:48:15 AM PST by Evolution
(CNSNews.com) - The Florida judge presiding over the Terri Schiavo case ordered the state agency charged with protecting vulnerable adults to make no attempt to take the brain-injured woman into protective custody late Wednesday. The order appears to be in direct contradiction to a state statute that requires the agency to act.
Mayo Clinic neurologist Dr. William Cheshire -- who is also a member of the Florida's Adult Protective Services team -- said late Wednesday that Terri Schiavo "may have been misdiagnosed" by one court appointed doctor and two other physicians chosen by Michael Schiavo.
Those three doctors declared Terri to be in a persistent vegetative state (PVS), but Cheshire said, based on his examination of Terri and review of her records, she is more likely in a minimally conscious state (MCS). The term is a new diagnostic description that has come into acceptance since Terri was last examined.
Florida Gov. Jeb Bush said the new information "raises serious concerns and warrants immediate action.
"Terri is now going on her sixth day without food or water," Gov. Bush told reporters Wednesday afternoon. "It is imperative that she be stabilized so that the adult protective services team can fulfill their statutory duty and thoroughly review all the facts surrounding her case."
One member of the media asked if the state Department of Children and Families (DCF) planned to take Terri Schiavo into protective custody, remove her from the hospice where she is being dehydrated and starved to death or try to reinsert her feeding and hydration tube.
"We are looking at every potential opportunity to be of assistance," replied DCF Secretary Lucy Hadi.
That response apparently prompted the attorney for Terri's estranged husband and legal guardian, Michael Schiavo, to contact Pinellas County Circuit Court Judge George Greer, requesting a court order barring the state from acting. Noted "right-to-die" attorney, author and activist George Felos argued during a court hearing later Wednesday that DCF had "no more power than ... a person walking down the street," to place Terri in protective custody.
"Any action would be a violation of Mrs. Schiavo's constitutional right to refuse medical treatment. It would be a violation of her civil rights. It would be an assault, a battery, a trespass on her," Felos argued, following his assessment with a threat aimed at DCF officials, "and, should that occur and should that be attempted, we will hold those to the fullest extent of the law."
But Florida statute 2004-Ch0415-Section%201051#0415.1051"415.1051 seems to contradict Felos' claim.
The statute states, "If it appears that the vulnerable adult ... is likely to incur a risk of death or serious physical injury if such person is not immediately removed from the premises, then the representative of the department shall transport or arrange for the transportation of the vulnerable adult to an appropriate medical or protective services facility in order to provide emergency protective services."
Jennifer Lima-Smith, an attorney for the DCF, reminded Greer that the agency does not need his permission in advance to act.
"The law allows the department to exercise both emergency protective services -- intervention and emergency removal -- either one or both," Lima-Smith told Greer.
The statute also appears to specifically exempt DCF from an otherwise enforceable mandate to seek Michael Schiavo's permission to remove Terri.
"If the vulnerable adult's caregiver or guardian is present, the protective investigator must seek the caregiver's or guardian's consent ... before the vulnerable adult may be removed from the premises," the law states, "unless the protective investigator suspects that the vulnerable adult's caregiver or guardian has caused the abuse, neglect, or exploitation."
The only authorization or requirement for the involvement of the courts in an emergency intervention or removal comes after DCF has taken its action. "The department shall, within 24 hours after providing or arranging for emergency removal of the vulnerable adult, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, petition the court for an order authorizing emergency protective services."
Nonetheless, Greer rebuked the agency, ordering it not to attempt to enforce the state law.
"Since it appears imminent that the department is likely to do something in contravention of that rule of law, this court is going to grant the oral motion," Greer said. "DCF is hereby restrained from taking possession of Theresa Marie Schiavo or removing her from Hospice Woodside, administer (sic) nutrition or hydration artificially or otherwise interfere (sic) with this court's final judgment."
That final portion of Greer's oral order seems to contradict yet another portion of the statute, entitled "Emergency medical treatment.
"If, upon admission to a medical facility, it is the opinion of the medical staff that immediate medical treatment is necessary to prevent serious physical injury or death, and that such treatment does not violate a known health care advance directive prepared by the vulnerable adult," the statute states, "the medical facility may proceed with treatment to the vulnerable adult."
Terri Schiavo has no such advance directive.
At approximately 11:00 p.m. EST, attorneys for Terri Schiavo's parents filed a 40-plus page request for an emergency injunction with the U.S. Supreme Court. The pleading asks the justices to order Terri's feeding and hydration tube reinserted while the lower federal courts conduct a completely new trial of the facts in the case. That review was mandated by special legislation passed by Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush earlier in the week.
Nonetheless, Greer rebuked the agency, ordering it not to attempt to enforce the state law.
It is official Judges are dictators they are the final arbitrar of everything. Why even have an Executive and Legislative Branch?
It is just a waste of time and money if at the end the Judges have the final say and can overturn anything!
I'm sensing a bit of desperation on the part of Judge Greer.
DCF should commit Judge Greer first.
Hasn't anyone exposed this Greer fella as card carrying member of NAMBLA yet? At least a kicker of chipmunks or something. I would kick a dollar into the kitty for the next person who comes before his court to refer to him as "your dishonor".
DCF needs to act. Greer is hopeless. He needs to be impeached, no matter how this ends up. Bet that when the "rock" at his probate court is turned over, lots of vermin will come running out.
I don't think it's going to be easy to hustle the body to a crematorium.
They say it doesn’t matter who votes, it’s who counts the votes that counts!
It doesn’t matter what the law says, it’s who decides what the law says that counts!
Greer knows he's in crap-city - he needs Terri to die as much as MS now: He is a pitiful excuse for a judge!
I believe Greer is doing this out of spite.
I wonder if the hospice has one on premises?
And I hope the Governor doesn't wait too long after Judge Greer rejects this latest bid. Anytime after that I wouldn't put it past these people to administer a "loving" dose of morphine to "compassionately" ease her passing.
Yep.
To me it just looks like he's following a pattern that's worked for him all along. No one's bothered to do more than bluster at him so far. And that's the pathetic truth.
Too many in America have been decieved by the great deciever and believe they honor the rule of Law -when in
fact they are following the corrupted rule of a corrupted Court.If the Law is to be honored then th egovernor -or the
President must get off their butt and ACT to honor their
Oath of Office and the Constitution ,and the Rule of Law as
defined by Wm.Blackstone,Transferred to James Wilson,and
Hamilton in teaching American Law For our law if it is valid must not contradict the Law of Nature dictated by God ,Himself, or the Revealed Law (as seen in Scripture)
By the shedding of innocent blood the land is defiled.(still applies TODAY)
ping for later
Judicial homicide.
"Where there's live, there's hope." Theresa Marie Schiavo
Excuse me if I'm wrong, BUT if Gov. Bush sees that a law is being broken and him being the Gov. doesn't he have the right to STEP in and take OVER whatever the law is breaking? ie: The rouge Judge has gone crazy and is giving rules that don't apply so its in direct violation of the Statue of the law, so he can step in and put Terri in protective custody from the JUDGE!!! Right??????
I want to change my tag line. Thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.