An impossibly high standard suggests activists are more intersted in agitation than safety.
1 posted on
03/24/2005 10:55:45 AM PST by
Gustov
To: Gustov
2 posted on
03/24/2005 11:00:09 AM PST by
MarineBrat
("God is dead"- Nietzsche,1886. "Nietzsche is dead"- God,1901)
To: Gustov
"An impossibly high standard suggests activists are more intersted in agitation than safety."
You get a gold star. Generally, that's what most "activism" is about. People who really care do things relevant, not street theater.
3 posted on
03/24/2005 11:01:01 AM PST by
L98Fiero
To: Gustov
Generally speaking, I don't believe the hype that surrounds these frequent danger announcements, and you can take my mascara when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
However, if there is a potential problem with chemicals used in cosmetics (for an historical example, see lead based face powders), I would like to be informed about it.
4 posted on
03/24/2005 11:02:44 AM PST by
Chiapet
To: Gustov
The toxic effect probably depends upon the level of exposure...
5 posted on
03/24/2005 11:04:36 AM PST by
Redcloak
(There is no "I" in team. But then again, there is no "us" in it either. There is "meat" however.)
To: Gustov
Rest assured that The Former Twelfth Lady will oppose any
calls to ban (or regulate) the cosmetics industry because
she knows that any such curbs would cost her any chance
that she might otherwise have to reoccupy Motel 1600 in 2008...or forever!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
