Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 03/24/2005 5:02:21 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:

Updated information: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1370152/posts



Skip to comments.

*BREAKING* JUDGE Whittemore to Rule or Overrule Judge Greer at 6:00PM
FOX ^ | 24 March 2005 | fox

Posted on 03/24/2005 11:19:53 AM PST by davidosborne


(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: cnflictinterestgreer; devilgreer; dontkillterri; euthanasia; evilfelos; feloshospiceboard; florida; foxnews; greerswife; greerwifehospboard; greerwifehospicebrd; greerwifeonhspboard; hospiceboardwife; judgegreer; judgewhittemore; pontiuspilate; schiavo; terri; terrischiavo; wasfelosonboard; wasgreerwifeboard; whoonhospiceboard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 1,401-1,446 next last

1 posted on 03/24/2005 11:19:57 AM PST by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

Why not NOW?


2 posted on 03/24/2005 11:21:11 AM PST by Stellar Dendrite (Not everyone here is your FRiend, watch out for the "opinion shapers" (aka troll with an agenda))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Jusge Whitamore says he wants brief by 3:00PM ET


3 posted on 03/24/2005 11:22:01 AM PST by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
Why not NOW?

Because that would not comply with the folly our courts have become.

4 posted on 03/24/2005 11:22:28 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

Who is Whitamore?


5 posted on 03/24/2005 11:22:36 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

I'm having a stupid moment. What does this mean? Thanks.


6 posted on 03/24/2005 11:22:43 AM PST by Jenya (Feed Terri Shiavo. Starve her husband.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

Why on Earth can't they reinsert the tube while they adjudicate this?


7 posted on 03/24/2005 11:22:52 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

Yadda, yadda, yadda.

I'm sorry, Terri, that no one would protect you.


8 posted on 03/24/2005 11:23:02 AM PST by Madeleine Ward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

WTH? Why is Whitamore getting involved now? Any idea what he wants the briefs to address?


9 posted on 03/24/2005 11:23:06 AM PST by jbarkley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
Satan's forces are working overtime to kill this one.

God bless and be with you, Terri. We love you.
10 posted on 03/24/2005 11:23:20 AM PST by reagan_fanatic ("Darwinism is a belief in the meaninglessness of existence" - R. Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

Huh?


11 posted on 03/24/2005 11:23:21 AM PST by mhking (If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Because it will give Greer the chance to come up with another 'bogus' reason to ignore it.


12 posted on 03/24/2005 11:23:22 AM PST by Bigh4u2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

I having a hard time keeping up with this all


13 posted on 03/24/2005 11:23:38 AM PST by Mo1 (Why can't the public see Terry - What are they afraid of ??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
That is outrageous. Terri could go into kidney failure or die by 6 PM. What is there to analyze in this case? How about a ruling in 15 minutes Judge Whittemore? Get off your fat a## and overturn this thug named Greer.
14 posted on 03/24/2005 11:23:39 AM PST by carl in alaska (Blog blog bloggin' on heaven's door.....Teddy's speeches are just one big snore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Why on Earth can't they reinsert the tube while they adjudicate this?

This is just a ruse to take more time off Mrs. Schiavo's life. It is about the most cynical and disgusting thing that I have seen from our judiciary.

15 posted on 03/24/2005 11:24:31 AM PST by snowsislander (Isa41:17-When the poor and needy seek water,and there is none,and their tongue faileth for thirst...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jbarkley

"Any idea what he wants the briefs to address?"

I would assume it's the new evidence that the Governor was talking about.


16 posted on 03/24/2005 11:24:35 AM PST by Bigh4u2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jbarkley

.....could it be the new evidence that Gov. Bush talked about in his press conference...that would result in the State of Florida taking custody of Terri?


17 posted on 03/24/2005 11:24:37 AM PST by smiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
My wife is a nursing home administrator and deals with late-stage and end-stage terminal patients all the time, including Alzheimer's patients. There is a point in a person's care where the limits of medicine are reached and their condition deteriorates to a point where they have no function, control or cognition. Alzheimer's is a terrible disease. In many cases, food and hydration is withheld from end-stage Alzheimer's patients who are in such a deep state of functionlessness that the doctors and family believe that there is no compassionate way to preserve their life, or any quality thereof. This is one of the most difficult challenges a family or a physician can come to, and there are often disagreements over when that stage has been reached. Some families opt to continue care until the patient's neurological function completely shuts down and they can no longer control their most basic automatic responses, such as breathing and heart control. Other families decide to allow their loved ones to pass on before that time by withholding nutrition.

I do not believe that Terri Sciavo-Schindler is a candidate for merciful euthanasia.

I have this opinion because I believe that her husband's motives are suspect, and that he judge in this case lacks the objectivity to give the case the proper judicial review. He never appointed am independent guardian for Terri. He ignored the greater number of persons who testified in favor of Terri's continued life, in favor of his own biases. He ruled against a wife who wished to keep her husband alive, and in favor of her children, who were prepared to inherit a sizable draw in a similar case before. There was only one person present at the time of Terri's collapse, and that was Michael. Her friends and family indicated that there was a history of domestic abuse. There was no evidence of a heart attack... only the evidence of a coronary arrest (there's a difference) and also of the lack of oxygen to her brain. There is no way to determine which came first. She had three broken bones after her "collapse". Her husband was CPR trained and did not provide her with CPR. When her brother Bobby, who lived in the same apartment complex arrived the night of her collapse, he found her face down... evidence that Michael took no effort to revive her, check her or resuscitate her. All of these are facts, sworn and stipulated in the court records.

Now to the issue of her "wish to die". No one, save Michael Sciavo has ever heard Terri discuss her dying wishes. It is true that most people don't discuss this with many people. What is more true is that Michael did not remember her wishes for SEVEN YEARS until after he had successfully sued for medical malpractice... arguing that he needed a large judgment to continue to care for Terri and to provide her with rehabilitation. He absolutely denied her that rehab. He was enabled by Judge Greer, who allowed him to move the money to a trust to that Terri could be put on Medicare. Her care is paid for by tax dollars, not by Michael, or through her civil judgment in the malpractice case. So Michael wanted her to live, up to the point when he got the judgment... then he found a girlfriend (he actually had a few) and got "engaged", sired two children and hired George Felos, a "death with dignity" attorney to help him fight against Terri's parents, who wanted to keep their daughter alive.

Michael has refused to allow Terri to have wet washcloths from which to suckle water. He has refused any and all feeding therapy, even though in sworn testimony, under penalty of purgery, Nurses and CNA's have testified that Terri can tolerate ice chips and even jello. She can be fed and hydrated WITHOUT a feeding tube, but Michael and Judge Greer refuse to allow it.

One nurse was fired after reporting to Police that she observed a syringe in the trash and needle marks under Terri's breast and in her groin after Michael was in the room alone with her. When Michael left, her blood sugar levels were so low that they were below testable limits. She surmised, with 12 years experience as a nurse, that Terri had been overdosed with insulin by Michael. Her employer terminated her.

Judge Greer's wife sits on the board of directors for the Hospice that Michael placed Terri in. There is another Judge in the Pinellas County Court who's wife is also a member of that same board. Michael and Judge Greer appear to have found a "safe" place to carry out their orders.

The problems in this case are VAST and that is why the US Congress and the President of the United States passed a law at 1AM in the morning that would compel a DE NOVO (Completely new, top to bottom) review of her case. The Judiciary in this instance has been an utter and complete failure. It has ignored the Congress, the President, and the facts of the case. It has hidden behind the "law" without standing up for what is right.

You can take any position that you want on Euthanasia, but you have to look at the circumstances in this case and be very confused as to why there is a rush to kill a woman now, by a man who did not want to kill her for the first 7 years after her malady. You have to wonder why the courts are protecting their own and refusing an order from two other coequal branches of government to take a fresh look at this case.
18 posted on 03/24/2005 11:25:31 AM PST by Nice50BMG (AB 50 outlaws the use of this tagline in California.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Huh?

Guess it's an appeal .. but isn't Whitamore a Fed Court?

19 posted on 03/24/2005 11:25:49 AM PST by Mo1 (Why can't the public see Terry - What are they afraid of ??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
Whittemore (not Whitamore) is the same judge who denied the request to have the feeding tube put back in on March 22. Go here and scroll down to "March 22, 2005" and there's a link to the court decision.
20 posted on 03/24/2005 11:25:56 AM PST by Tarantulas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
If Gov. Bush isn't collecting the evidence and testimony of the criminality of Michael Schiavo, then he is malfeasant.
21 posted on 03/24/2005 11:25:56 AM PST by unspun (unspun.info | What do you think of myconservativeprecinct.com?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Madeleine Ward

Well I really hope Jeb Bush's people have been in contact with Judge Whittemore and they know he's going to reverse Greer's ruling, and that the Florida DCF will use the time to prepare for a transfer of custody at 6 PM. I'm hoping that some sanity will come to this case at last.


22 posted on 03/24/2005 11:26:00 AM PST by carl in alaska (Blog blog bloggin' on heaven's door.....Teddy's speeches are just one big snore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

I guess my brain is too fried to keep all of this straight. Why would the Federal court be involved in the custody. Maybe he is going for the "de novo" finally?


23 posted on 03/24/2005 11:26:03 AM PST by jbarkley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

These judges are all evil.


24 posted on 03/24/2005 11:26:05 AM PST by rushmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska

Yes, there is no more time to play with the system. There never was, really.


25 posted on 03/24/2005 11:26:10 AM PST by RightWhale (Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jbarkley

From what I understood, they are asking the judge to review the law Judge Greer used in doing what he did rather than looking at Judge Greer himself. The courts seem to be more comfortable doing this.


26 posted on 03/24/2005 11:26:17 AM PST by maxter (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

*LIVE* Judge to RULE on Gov. Bush's Request for Custody of Schiavo! (MOTION DENIED 2:07 ET) - RELATED THREAD...

27 posted on 03/24/2005 11:26:23 AM PST by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

He's the federal judge who drew the federal case in Tampa and already ruled against the parents once. He'll do it again.


28 posted on 03/24/2005 11:26:48 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

Terri can't wait that long. This is ridiculous. Jeb Bush - get moving!!!!!!!!!! For the Love of God.


29 posted on 03/24/2005 11:27:04 AM PST by Saundra Duffy ("Where there's life, there's hope." Theresa Marie Schiavo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

?....old 'news'...????.............what is the correct 'date' on this.... 'breaking'..... story?


30 posted on 03/24/2005 11:27:04 AM PST by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I am having a hard time all around---I am trying not to have this affect me "in my real life", so to speak, but I am having a hard time shaking this sadness and disbelief-

I dont' think there is any way that I will ever be convinced that what is happening is the "correct" thing, either morally, ethically, or even legally!!! It just feels too wrong....

Do you know what I mean?


31 posted on 03/24/2005 11:27:13 AM PST by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Chief Justice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tarantulas

Why does this Judge want this case again??? So he can put more coals on the fire? I hope he's had a change of heart!


32 posted on 03/24/2005 11:27:13 AM PST by areafiftyone (The Democrat's Mind: The Hamster's dead but the wheel's still spinning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: maxter

okay, that makes more sense. That will teach me to switch the channel for 5 minutes.


33 posted on 03/24/2005 11:27:32 AM PST by jbarkley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
The actual spelling of the judge's name is Whittemore.
34 posted on 03/24/2005 11:27:41 AM PST by Pyro7480 ("All my own perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded upon Our Lady." - Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jbarkley
Maybe he is going for the "de novo" finally?

Maybe .. I'm at a loss as to why he went to a fed court

35 posted on 03/24/2005 11:27:48 AM PST by Mo1 (Why can't the public see Terry - What are they afraid of ??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tarantulas

Isn't he the one that took all the time in the world to decide as well. I'm not trusting this guy. Sounds like they are just trying to take more time off the clock. Hopefully I'm wrong, but I think it's gonna be another disappointment.


36 posted on 03/24/2005 11:28:09 AM PST by beaversmom (The Democrats--The Right to Kill party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jbarkley

"Maybe he is going for the "de novo" finally?"

That's my best guess.


37 posted on 03/24/2005 11:28:26 AM PST by Bigh4u2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

I don't understand this. Why does he want this case again? Did he request it himself? I am really confused now.


38 posted on 03/24/2005 11:28:29 AM PST by BonneBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Tarantulas

So WHY are they pursuing THIS person if he laready denied Terri BEFORE?


39 posted on 03/24/2005 11:28:31 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rushmom
Unfortunately they are going by the letter of the law in this case it seems. What would be great would be going by the spirit of the law (judicial activism).
40 posted on 03/24/2005 11:28:37 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jbarkley

He's involved because the parents filed papers asking him to do something. He's obviously not going to give a de novo now. That would take months to prepare. They are asking for some kind of temporary relief, I'm sure, based on things that have happened after he ruled last time, probably the fact that the state court judge ordered Jeb not to get involved. They want that order thrown out no doubt. Won't happen, though.


41 posted on 03/24/2005 11:29:10 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Nice50BMG

Thanks for a wonderful overview post!


42 posted on 03/24/2005 11:29:20 AM PST by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: maxter
From what I understood, they are asking the judge to review the law Judge Greer used in doing what he did rather than looking at Judge Greer himself. The courts seem to be more comfortable doing this.

Who is asking this?

43 posted on 03/24/2005 11:29:24 AM PST by Mo1 (Why can't the public see Terry - What are they afraid of ??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
Not now because the Judge hopes by delaying Terri might die or at least deminish her chances of surviving.
44 posted on 03/24/2005 11:29:35 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
If Terri Schiavo is to get any relief, it will have to come in defiance of the courts, not through the courts.

That much should be painfully obvious by now.

45 posted on 03/24/2005 11:29:38 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Who else are they going to ask? Certainly not Greer.


46 posted on 03/24/2005 11:29:51 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Nice50BMG

Thank you for your thoughts.


47 posted on 03/24/2005 11:29:56 AM PST by liberty2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: smiley

Although I disagree with the court, I have some degree of respect for the court's view of what is going on. BUT I also think at this point Judge Greer would not feed Terri if she sent him a signed note requesting it. Maybe that is an exaggeration, but it seems clear to me he is being injudicious by refusing to consider new evidence or the standing of state agencies. And it certainly takes on the appearance that judge Greer is NOT going to allow any events (like a living Terri in rehab) to demonstrate that he may have been wrong.


48 posted on 03/24/2005 11:29:56 AM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rushmom
These judges are all evil.

Anybody out there still with any respect for our judicial system?

49 posted on 03/24/2005 11:30:03 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Sure they could, but they don't want to.


50 posted on 03/24/2005 11:30:11 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 1,401-1,446 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson