[oldcomputerguy]

"It is Harrison (see the testimony in the link) who makes the read of the EEG -- and I just don't believe him,"'

So yet again you have dodged the rather simple question I posed to you about a flatlined EEG. And managed to avoid the second question about which test is used to determine brain death in other patients. While you got an A in English comp, I would have to give you an F in debate.

OK I quit now, on to other things, your postings or lack of them stand on their own.

[WL-law]

a flatlined EEG.

You're tiresome sa well, and I'm being charitable in my description of you.

I'll say it one more time, to address your puny arguments:

1) I don't believe the EEG report in the first place; and

2) in any event such as this one, where there are conflicting reports and contesting parties regarding the evidence, the BEST EVIDENCE should be required.

Whether EEGs are relied on in other situations, i.e., uncontested situations without conflicting parties or conflicting evidence, then less-than-the-best evidence may not raise any objections from the participants. That's irrelevant here.

Oh, by the way, as to your last point, I absolutely ENCOURAAGE you to find "other things" to do -- because if you can rationalize letting Terri die, your opinions on EVERYTHING ELSE are, frankly, forever worthless to me.