Excuse me , Mr. Schiavo, I just have one more question...
Posted on 03/27/2005 6:31:02 AM PST by gesully
The Hospice should be investigated for her being there for 5 YEARS at $5000.00 a month paid by Medicaid. Hospice is only for 6 months.
" As soon as Terri is dead, he will have her remains cremated, and in doing so, destroy the evidence that could prove beyond a doubt, that he assaulted Terri and caused her condition.
Cremation also removes the evidence that she is not in a permanent vegetative state."
And I predict that Jeb will do nothing to stop it, because he can't have it be proven that he let an innocent woman die on his watch.
Here's a link to an email from yesterday from Cheryl Ford, R.N., who has been involved with trying to save Terri for years.
She talks about the drugs now being administered to hasten Terri's death:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1370368/posts?page=4342#4342
I've been curious as to what the malpractice suit was all about?
It seems apparent that the husband was malpracticing his marriage vows.
Moreover, Michael Schiavo played the Schindler family for everything he could get out of them during the trial. Making it seem like they were a happy united family and that dear Michael was just the greatest son-in-law any one could have. Later they found out he forsaked their daughter when he recieved money for her rehab.
He said no money will be used to treat Terri, denying her the slightest stimulation of music, tv, radio, etc. He withheld antibiotics when she had infections. He even did in her beloved cats and melted down her wedding rings in order to make a ring for himself. To top it off he sets up house with live-in mistress and proceeds to have children out of wedlock. He loves his two women so dearly.
There never has been a more loving, devoted, husband, ever. (Not)
I agree the lamestream lefties are sailing on a ship of fools and imbecile tools of the right to die and lie crowd.
Excuse me , Mr. Schiavo, I just have one more question...
I have more of a problem with doctors, like Cranford, who travel the country misdiagnosing patients as PVS and think that those patients have no constitutional rights.
It's an interesting combination of the "the old one-two" with "the old heave-ho." Sort of a hybrid approach, you might say.
1) Diagnose undesirables as PVS with no constitutional rights, then
2) Push them off the planet.
FReegards,
Did any of Michael's bottles contain steroids?
Congress might be interested in that, if nothing else.
Bingo, you nailed it. The parents could not suspect him given what their daughter was going thru.
I have wondered, remember when Terri came home to be cared for by them and MS very early and it lasted a few weeks. I wonder, what happened then? Surely that is when their suspicions must have been less suppressed.
This is indeed a family drama played out in the courts, press and the hearts of the country. I suspect that MS is not afraid of terri's recovery, what seems to motivate him now is sadistic vengence toward the parents. They caused him to be unable to have her die early and leave some money for him. And she is a living, breathing reminder, indeed a monument to his guilt, and has to be obliterated.
What MS does not know is that this will never end until he is in the grave. It will go on and on and on.
I think the problem here is that people are bringing up all of these side issues which are confusing people and the real issues are getting lost. Both sides are putting a lot of misinformation out there. Yesterday was a perfect example of just that. One side says she is shriveling up like a prune, skin peeling and so on. The otherside says she is resting comfortably. The truth is somewhere in between. The only frame of reference I have is my beloved uncle who died a couple of years ago. His feeding tube was removed and he was quite comfortable to the end. To keep his lips and eyes moist we used eye drops and vasilene.
Other than that, we were all gathered around him supporting and praying for him. It was one of the most moving experiences of my life, other than removing life support measures for my little boy 12 years ago. (We are all Catholics by the way and the preist was there also.)
After working in the legal system, I have learned that just because someone (could be from either side of the issue), swears in court, in a deposition, or an affidavit does not mean they are telling the truth.
It really comes down to credibility, now most here think MS is the devil in disguise, evil, a murderer and so on and therefore has zero credibility, and when you strip away the BS, I really see no problem here other than the two families are at odds about what is best for Terri. Anyway, that is how I see it.
The other day, Felos thanked the ACLU for helping Michael.
I'd love to know exactly what "help" they supplied. Back in 1999, the ACLU gave an award and a dinner to Former Chief Justice of the Florida State Supreme Court, Gerald Kogan who supports Physician Assisted Death.
To keep his lips and eyes moist we used eye drops and vasilene.
** Would be nice if Terri was getting that much.
"He can't have her recover and expose what he did."
Exactly!!!
I have believed this from the beginning.
I dont trust anyone in this matter.
Not necessarily.
It's just as likely that one side is telling the truth.
I don't buy Felos' public comment that Terri looks beautiful.
Terri's parents will pursue Michael Schiavo after Terri has slipped away. He will never rest. They will haunt him till the day they die. Michael has a hollow victory to look forward to.
This is a red herring. She will never ever be able to talk short of a miracle. Whatever so called evidence there was it is long gone. I do not believe he tried to kill her anyway.
I seem to have read the fertility doc was sued because he didn't know or should have known she had bulemia which MS denied he knew. That diagnosis was a suspicion because she had low potassium when she came in the hospital and had lost alot of weight in the years before, by her wishes. I don't know if anyone has confirmed it. But nevertheless I do think the suit was settled probably because the ins carrier didn't want to take the chance of a huge settlement on trial. Doesn't mean the doc was guilty. And I thought I read the hospital was sued but don't know.
Was your uncle terminally ill at the time? Terri was physically healthy. There's a big difference.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.