Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spending Sits Well with GOP Governors
Boston Globe ^ | March 27, 2005 | T.R. Reid

Posted on 03/27/2005 10:53:33 AM PST by HostileTerritory

DENVER--Governor Bill Owens, a Republican, has been crisscrossing the country for years promoting the virtues of this state's strict constitutional limits on government spending. He has repeatedly urged other states to adopt restrictions of their own, based on Colorado's Taxpayer Bill of Rights amendment, known as TABOR.

But this summer, Owens says, he will traverse his own mountainous state pushing the opposite message. Midway through his second term, Owens is working to persuade Coloradans to suspend the limits he championed and let the state government spend $3 billion more in tax money than TABOR would allow.

Owens thus becomes another low-tax, limited-government advocate who has found those principles hard to hold onto amid a sluggish economy and a sharply diminished flow of federal money to the states.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Government; US: Colorado; US: Idaho; US: Indiana; US: Nevada; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: ahole; billowens; daniels; gop; governor; guinn; kempthorne; owens; rino; rinowatch; rnc; taft; taxes; taxincrease
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 03/27/2005 10:53:35 AM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

Or maybe he has national ambitions and is trying to appeal to the "moderates."


2 posted on 03/27/2005 10:55:44 AM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

Not-Terri-Schiavo BTTT


3 posted on 03/27/2005 11:02:10 AM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad

I've got to wonder if anyone but hard-core Democrats is pleased by tax hikes. Moderates don't like taxes any more than conservatives.


4 posted on 03/27/2005 11:02:44 AM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

I guess I can scratch another one off my list for '08.


5 posted on 03/27/2005 11:03:09 AM PST by tomahawk (http://tomahawkblog.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

But moderates like big govt. You need to have more taxes for big govt.


6 posted on 03/27/2005 11:04:31 AM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad

I remember when "us republican" decried spending increases, tax increases and deficit spending. Or was that just a dream????


7 posted on 03/27/2005 11:04:33 AM PST by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

Terri's going to win in 08.


8 posted on 03/27/2005 11:05:19 AM PST by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: biff

That was just a dream


9 posted on 03/27/2005 11:05:40 AM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

I think we need to figure out how many years of "shelf life" Republican pols have before they turn rotten and end up being like Democrats. Then vote out any Republican who is past his due date.


10 posted on 03/27/2005 11:06:40 AM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory
vote for the real small goverment fewer taxes party http://www.lp.org
11 posted on 03/27/2005 11:07:52 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Jacques Chirac and Kofi Annan, a pantomime horse in which both men are playing the rear end. M.Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf

Her position on dividend tax rates is a deal-breaker. Also, if what her parents allege is true, I really don't think she'd support covenant marriage.


12 posted on 03/27/2005 11:08:29 AM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory
Tax spending sits better with Democrats.
13 posted on 03/27/2005 11:20:08 AM PST by demlosers (Soylent Green is made in Florida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

THE REAL PROBLEM is that these pols, repubs and leftist Dems alike, just cannot seem to grasp the CONCEPT OF REDUCING GOVERNMENT SPENDING. It totally evades their thinking -- amazing how that works -- so when the economy softens, THEIR SPENDING DOES N-O-T !!!!

So the logical answer, IS JUST INCREASE TAXATION. Tax them out of existence, no problem..the next guy in office can worry about that, RIGHT ??? Stinking politicians.


14 posted on 03/27/2005 11:31:46 AM PST by EagleUSA (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory
Owens is working to persuade Coloradans to suspend the limits he championed and let the state government spend $3 billion more in tax money than TABOR would allow.

D@mn RINOs.

These people are worthless, pandering, ideological traitors to the real GOP.

Real conservatives have no alternative but to seriously form a Third Party.

15 posted on 03/27/2005 11:37:09 AM PST by Liberator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberator

No mention on what it would be for, just red meat to get you mad.


16 posted on 03/27/2005 11:43:35 AM PST by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Liberator

I think they are the real GOP. Can you, or anyone else, name any Republican elected official anywhere who, once in office, has actually lowered spending? That is opposed to slowing the growth of spending which is all that Reagan and others were able to do. I don't think the ex-Governor of New Mexico, Gary Johnson, was able to do that. He was a RINO though, as is Ron Paul, a Libertarian running as a Republican.


17 posted on 03/27/2005 11:58:22 AM PST by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Liberator

And the public needs the expenditure of $3 billion for exactly what purpose?


18 posted on 03/27/2005 12:30:38 PM PST by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory
Not all Republicans believe there are limits on what government should or is even capable of doing. Sometimes Republicans obtain an office only to grow into this limitless world or, rather, catch the disease. This may be worse than those that move into office with the condition already firmly entrenched.

In real life, there is no limit to the problems that are caused when Republicans and drunken sailors spend like Democrats.

19 posted on 03/27/2005 12:56:07 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Because politicians have a conflict of interest with limited govt. That is why we had a Constitution. Both the executive and legislature had a party when judges threw it out, because they didn't want to do it themselves. Then they could blame the unelected and appointed for life judges. It is a great game in Washington. I feel sorry for the idiots who get caught up in Republican-Democrat fights not realizing that at their core both parties are the same pro-govt parties.


20 posted on 03/27/2005 1:49:19 PM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson