To: pabianice
Doesn't this create a serious air defense gap? I reckon the justification presumes that "there is no credible threat of aerial attack" or some such ... sort of our version of the ill fated "10 year rule" that nearly resulted in the UK being beaten by Hitler.
7 posted on
03/28/2005 2:47:44 PM PST by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: GOP_1900AD
Doesn't this create a serious air defense gap? P-3s don't provide air defense. They would make shark bait of that supposed terrorist fleet, not mention noisy ChiCom submarines.
21 posted on
03/28/2005 3:20:06 PM PST by
El Gato
(Activist Judges can twist the Constitution into anything they want ... or so they think.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson