No, she's certainly not anyone's property, but she can't make medical decisions on her own--someone has to do that for her.
You seem to think that a lawyer should represent "her" interests, but how do you know what those interests are? How does the lawyer know? Terri can't talk, she can't communicate.
I think the problem is who makes those medical decisions for Terri. These ain't easy questions, and I think it's a little dishonest to say that Sec. 2 is absolute, like Keyes claims.
Section Two IS absolute, for the innocent.
Surely you're not one of those who refuses to discern between the innocent and those who are found guilty of capital crimes??