Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah

Good post!

Irrelevant and immaterial. More's conundrum was not related to the Life issue (except his own...) and it is clear that under the FL Constitution AND the US Constitution, either executive (or Congressional) actions can be taken.

Further, it is clear that the Fed Courts simply ignored explicit Congressional language in failing to de-novo review the case.


29 posted on 03/29/2005 3:57:31 PM PST by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: ninenot
More's conundrum was not related to the Life issue (except his own...) and it is clear that under the FL Constitution AND the US Constitution, either executive (or Congressional) actions can be taken.

Actually, it is not clear at all.

Further, it is clear that the Fed Courts simply ignored explicit Congressional language in failing to de-novo review the case.

Please quit blaming the courts for not reaching beyond the pleading filed by Gibbs. He deliberately threw the case by not filing a review for the merits of the ruling, merely by rehashing already-settled procedural arguments.

33 posted on 03/29/2005 4:01:54 PM PST by Poohbah (If it's called "collateral damage," how come I can't use it to secure a loan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson