Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
and concluded that Terri would not have wanted to live that way.

But "that way" could be conditional on the quality and dedication of MS's care. Even if Terri has dim perceptions, perhaps her preference would be to fall under her own parents' guardianship.

Greer is being highly presumptive, and should have erred on the life-side, IMHO.

13 posted on 03/30/2005 2:37:11 PM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Fitzcarraldo
"But "that way" could be conditional on the quality and dedication of MS's care. Even if Terri has dim perceptions, perhaps her preference would be to fall under her own parents' guardianship."

You are 100% correct. Different people could look at the situation differently.

That's why Michael turned it over to Judge Greer. This was Judge Greer's decision, not Michael's.

Judge Greer reviewed everything and came to the conclusion he did.

"Greer is being highly presumptive, and should have erred on the life-side, IMHO."

If Judge Greer could not find "clear and convincing" evidence, then yes, he should have ordered the feeding tube to remain.

18 posted on 03/30/2005 2:45:42 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson