Skip to comments.
The emperor's new robes [Ann Coulter on the death of Terri Schiavo]
World Net Daily ^
| March 30, 2005
| Ann Coulter
Posted on 03/30/2005 3:47:59 PM PST by perfect stranger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 last
To: perfect stranger
> But spare me the paeans to "strict constructionism" and "limited government." <
Except if such arguments suit your needs, then praise State's Rights and federalism.
To: nutmeg
As usual, spot on. I agree with every word. She's so eloquent.
82
posted on
04/01/2005 5:12:24 AM PST
by
stanz
(Those who don't believe in evolution should go jump off the flat edge of the Earth.)
To: Heuristic Hiker
To: MHGinTN
Here's a line from her Speaker's Bureau puff piece:
Crier, a Texas -bred independent with a passion for justice, debates with her guests the provocative topics of the day.
It says that she was first elected in Dallas County as a state judge in 1984, but it does not give her party. She has a real passion for judicial power.
84
posted on
04/01/2005 3:05:35 PM PST
by
Theodore R.
(Cowardice is forever!)
To: Cboldt
Did you know at one time that Ann considered challenging the popular Shays in a CT Republican primary but ultimately decided she could not take the reduction in rank even if successful?
85
posted on
04/01/2005 3:07:26 PM PST
by
Theodore R.
(Cowardice is forever!)
To: rhema
I know, people in Pinellas and Pasco counties may be asked when they stand before the Creator to give an account of their sins: "Why did you support George W. Greer?"
86
posted on
04/01/2005 3:09:43 PM PST
by
Theodore R.
(Cowardice is forever!)
To: perfect stranger
On the basis of these facts, Pinellas County Judge George Greer found that it was Terri's wish to be starved to death. She requires no life support; all she needs is food and water. If being (a) on a liquid diet, and (b) unresponsive to one's estranged husband are now considered grounds for a woman's execution, wait until this news hits Beverly Hills! Bwahaha. She's great.
87
posted on
04/01/2005 3:11:35 PM PST
by
NeoCaveman
(Abortion, euthanasia , socialized medicine, don't Democrats just kill you.....)
To: perfect stranger
Oh, there's an awful lot of pubbies and freepers ouching from this one lol. I feel vindicated when Annie comes up agreeing with me right down the line. She doesn't seem to have addressed the issue of all the other branches hiding their heads in the sand because some little peon judge made a ruling.. else many here would be calling her the same things the Dims often do, I'm sure.
88
posted on
04/01/2005 9:14:15 PM PST
by
Havoc
(Reagan was right and so was McKinley. Down with free trade. Hang the traitors high)
To: perfect stranger
Congress may have to check her for Steroids, Dinger!! Ann Rox!!
Pray for W and Terri's Family
89
posted on
04/01/2005 9:22:49 PM PST
by
bray
(Iraq, freed from Saddamn now Pray for Freedom from Mohammad)
To: perfect stranger
Also on the pro-killing side are conservatives still pissed off about the Civil Rights Act of 1964I'm surprised no one picked up on that damning zinger. Makes a darn good tag line.
90
posted on
04/01/2005 9:38:21 PM PST
by
Diddle E. Squat
("Also on the pro-killing side are conserv. still p.o.ed about the Civil Rights Act of1964"-A.Coulter)
To: alloysteel
Ann is correct in that only one opinion has been issued in this circumstance - that of Judge Greer. Other levels of the judiciary have reviewed the case, but no additional facts involving the case have been introduced or even considered. The review of the case has been limited to determining if there was "judicial error" in arriving at the decision, and finding none, the verdict was simply rubber-stamped. What puzzles me: When a judge rules "a finding of fact"
such a ruling carries with it the principle of "undeniable proof".
Contrast that with conclusions of a scientific
experiment. For credibility, other scientists must be
able to replicate the experiment.
Conversely, no judge up the line will question a finding of fact. My question is: Is there anyway to question findings of fact? What are the grounds for impeachment of a judge? Can't congress investigate a judges finding?
As an aside I wonder whether Greer would support a finding of fact about the Resurrection.
91
posted on
04/02/2005 11:59:28 PM PST
by
cliff630
(cliff630 (Didn't Pilate ask Christ, "What is the Truth." Even while looking in the face of TRUTH))
To: xsmommy
"How often have we seen these arguments bandied about on FR? limited gov't? strict constructionists? from the armchair constitutional scholars on FR who stayed at a holiday inn express last night."
Good one!
92
posted on
04/03/2005 7:48:20 AM PDT
by
PatriotGirl827
(Would you rather be O.J.'s girlfriend or Michael Schiavo's fiancee? - Ann Coulter)
To: anniegetyourgun
Excellent article. Sometimes I wish I could be Ann for just one day! She must have so much fun! I agree :
"It doesn't need force because it has smoke and mirrors and a lot of people defending the moronic scribblings of any judge as the perfect efflorescence of "the rule of law."
Bears repeating again and again!
To: AndyTheBear
but only helpless people Not so. It requires only a declaration of sacer by the State and then anyone may be the agent of the State. Pull the plug, no penalty, no homocide. It could be somebody walking around, a warrant comes down, and it is open season.
94
posted on
04/06/2005 8:16:06 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(50 trillion sovereign cells working together in relative harmony)
To: RightWhale
The Outlaw--a fine American State tradition.
95
posted on
04/06/2005 8:17:05 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(50 trillion sovereign cells working together in relative harmony)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson