Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United Nations Biosphere Reserve Land Grabs
CFP ^ | March 31, 2005 | Nathan Tabor

Posted on 03/31/2005 8:15:58 AM PST by MikeEdwards

What do the Statue of Liberty, Independence Hall, and Monticello have in common? The average American with a smattering of historical knowledge might say that those historic sites are all symbolic of America’s unique heritage of freedom.

Monticello, of course, was the home of Thomas Jefferson, the author of the Declaration of Independence. That document (as well as the U.S. Constitution, later) was signed in Independence Hall. The Statue of Liberty memorializes the free nation under God that those founding documents created.

What about the Great Smoky Mountains, Yellowstone Park, and the Grand Canyon? Well, these priceless natural resources are all managed by the U.S. National Parks Service. They are among the most frequently visited natural recreation areas in America, where millions of American families vacation every year.

Would it surprise you to learn that every one of these unique American landmarks is also controlled by the United Nations? It’s amazing but true. Every one of the natural and historic treasures listed above--plus more than a dozen more in America--has been designated an official World Heritage Site by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), which is headquartered in Paris, France.

Sites included in the World Heritage program are considered to have "outstanding universal value" as part of our common world heritage. They are designated as protected areas under the 1972 World Heritage Treaty, which is itself an outgrowth of the 1968 UNESCO Biosphere Conference -- where the currently ubiquitous concept of "sustainable development" first saw the light of day. . . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: biosphere; corruption; environment; environmentalists; grab; land; landgrab; propertyrights; turass; un; unitednations

1 posted on 03/31/2005 8:16:00 AM PST by MikeEdwards
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards; Mr. Mojo

I just read an article in the local paper this past week that the Navajo Tribe has contacted UNESCO to have them make one of their "sacred" mountains protected by UNESCO so it won*t have any construction done on it. The reason they did it is because AZ wants to do something with it. It*s hard to believe that OUR landmarks and treasures are being put under UNESCO. New World Order, here we come!!


2 posted on 03/31/2005 8:24:29 AM PST by NRA2BFree (Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards
Keep adding things like goofy LOST to this mix and pretty soon the US will be sovereign over nothing.

Oh wait !<-slap forehead> ! That's zactly what the UN wants.
3 posted on 03/31/2005 8:25:01 AM PST by stylin19a (Always remember - don't ever forget - "One Good Turn........GETS ALL THE BLANKETS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards

No treaty in violation of the Constitution has any authority despite what the maggots in govt would have you believe. This is a principal & agent thing. We The People (the principals) never delegated authority to abrogate the Constitution to our agents in govt. Period. Remember that the next time you talk to your congressrat.


4 posted on 03/31/2005 8:30:56 AM PST by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agitator

Bump for later.


5 posted on 03/31/2005 8:33:49 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: agitator

Ref post #4.

You are absolutely correct. I'm not losing any sleep over this.

Further, UNSESCO has these landmarks all over the world. And as far as I can figure out, it’s a sign that reads “UNSESCO blah, blah, blah,” and that is all. It’s like putting “Killroy was here” signs all over the place. One day when we’ve had enough of this UN nonsense, we can and will turn our backs on all this meaningless foolishness because that is what it is. What are they going to do? Send in the blue helmets?


6 posted on 03/31/2005 8:52:26 AM PST by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

they won't send in the blue helmets until the sheople have been sufficiently conditioned to accept it.


7 posted on 03/31/2005 8:56:53 AM PST by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards
I first saw this on a sign at Mt. Mitchell, N.C. and was stunned to say the least. When mentioning it to friends in the area, they said little and did nothing - no one seemed to care and had little or no information on the United Nations. This is what happens if we don't care enough to do a little research and contact our elected when Grand Theft is going on under our very noses.

I urge all to do something now - write - do not e-mail - write your Congressmen and your Senators to rescind all agreements with these un-elected Bureaucrats here in the USA and around the world. The United Nations is full of “blind trusts”, UNESCO for instance and thousands of agencies under the UN that are slowly eroding our Sovereignty and our unalienable rights. Our dollars, not theirs are paying for the preservation of these lands.

Further [snip] Every one of the natural and historic treasures listed above--plus more than a dozen more in America--has been designated an official World Heritage Site by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), which is headquartered in Paris, France.”>

Are you involved in a EPA program or send money to an EPA program that supports this? You had better find out.

8 posted on 03/31/2005 9:02:40 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree

Well, they can claim it but let them try to come take it.


9 posted on 03/31/2005 9:04:40 AM PST by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards
Action Alert!		Action Alert!		Action Alert!

*** URGENT: Invasive Species Legislation in Highway Bill!

If you have “non-native” weeds, grass, trees, or shrubs on your property (and everyone does) you’re in trouble.  

Under “invasive species” provisions currently sitting in the Senate’s version of the transportation bill, your property could quickly become the target of radical environmentalists and federal bureaucrats.  The bill’s name is the “Safe, Accountable, Flexible and Efficient Transportation Equity Act” or SAFETEA 2005 (*please note* that it does not yet have a bill number).

It is vitally important that you call both of your Senators this week, and next week, and tell them to DEMAND that any invasive species provisions be stripped from the SAFETEA bill.  SAFETEA could come up for a vote before the full Senate at ANY TIME!

**Call the Senate Switchboard at (202) 224-3121 and simply ask for your Senators by name.**

Currently, the SAFETEA act contains provisions to “minimize invasive species.”  This is the foot in the door to federal control of ALL so-called “invasive species” -- something that the greens openly covet.

Under the Senate version of SAFETEA, the federal government will dictate to the states what types of grasses and plants are allowed to be planted next to roads.  This has nothing to do with science or the environment.  This is about LAND CONTROL and MONEY FOR RADICAL GREEN GROUPS.

**Call your Senators at (202) 224-3121 and tell them: NO INVASIVE SPECIES PROVISIONS in the transportation bill!**

Imagine the Endangered Species Act on steroids.  Now multiply its devastating effect on property rights one-hundred fold.  That should give you a pretty good idea of what “invasive species” legislation will mean for property owners in every state, county, and city in this nation.  

“Invasive species” is the radical greens’ key to controlling every square inch of land in the United States.  And SAFETEA is the just the beginning.

This nightmare all began when Bill Clinton signed Executive Order 13112 in 1999, creating an “Invasive Species Council” to monitor and control “alien species.”  What are alien species?  According to Clinton’s Order, “alien species means, with respect to a particular ecosystem, any species, including seeds, eggs, spores, or other biological material capable of propagating that species, that is not native to that ecosystem.”  

Most agricultural crops and animal species clearly fall within the definition of “alien.”  Domesticated pets, many houseplants, and Kentucky bluegrass used in most lawns and golf courses are already defined as alien species.  Indeed, this is all the greens and their allies in the federal government need to control all land in the U.S.

Think the invasive species monster can’t get any worse?  It already has.  In 2001, the Invasive Species Council issued a management plan that states:  “Council member agencies will work with the Global Invasive Species Programme (GISP) and other relevant bodies to expand opportunities to share information, technologies, and technical capacity on the control and management of invasive species with other countries, promoting environmentally sound control and management practices.”

And just what is the Global Invasive Species Programme?  A quick trip to the GISP website reveals it is:

- The United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP)
- The United Nations Environmental, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
- The Convention on Biological Diversity
- The Nature Conservancy
- The International Union for the Protection of Nature
- DIVERSITAS: An International Programme of Biodiversity Science (another UNESCO project)

Invasive species legislation opens the door to federal and international control over private property in the United States.  And that’s why greens in the Senate are trying to sneak it into the federal transportation bill -- without ANY proper debate.

We are running out of time.  Contact your Senators TODAY, TOMORROW, AND NEXT WEEK.  

The House version of the transportation bill has already passed and thankfully does NOT include any invasive species language.  But the Senate version (SAFETEA 2005) DOES!  Once again, the House is on the right track and the Senate is out in left field.

ACT NOW!

**Action to Take**

Call both of your Senators and tell them to DEMAND that any and all “invasive species” provisions are REMOVED from the Senate transportation bill (SAFETEA).  Call the Senate Switchboard at (202) 224-3121 and ask for your Senators by name.

***PLEASE SEND THIS URGENT ALERT TO AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE***

10 posted on 03/31/2005 9:13:53 AM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agitator
Good morning.
"They won't send in the blue helmets until the sheeple have been sufficiently conditioned to accept it."

In the absence of acceptance, disarmament will suffice.

Molon Labe

Michael Frazier
11 posted on 03/31/2005 9:28:04 AM PST by brazzaville (No surrender,no retreat. Well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; Velveeta; DAVEY CROCKETT; jerseygirl; Donna Lee Nardo; TexasCowboy; WestCoastGal; ...

Ping


12 posted on 03/31/2005 12:47:53 PM PST by nw_arizona_granny (The enemy within, will be found in the "Communist Manifesto 1963", you are living it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson