To: doug from upland
"The problem was that the picture had a guy with no shirt and tatoos."
That's really just about as ridiculous.
2 posted on
03/31/2005 11:16:19 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
To: cripplecreek
He's a MARINE for heaven's sake! Have you EVER seen a Marine WITHOUT tatoos?!
3 posted on
03/31/2005 11:18:30 AM PST by
hiredhand
(Pudge the Indestructible Kitty lives at http://www.justonemorefarm.com)
To: cripplecreek
The point is that it was not about the weapon. That was the controversy. If she thought it better to have a dignified picture, that is just fine. The picture is now proudly displayed. Give her some credit. You know that there are many schools that would not allow the picture because of the weapon.
4 posted on
03/31/2005 11:18:55 AM PST by
doug from upland
(MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
To: cripplecreek
Nipples and guns could be a distraction to some.
34 posted on
03/31/2005 1:15:32 PM PST by
Rebelbase
(Accused Culture of Death member.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson