Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian Plant Launches Production of New Sukhoi Tactical Bomber
MosNews.com ^ | 31.03.2005

Posted on 03/31/2005 2:18:32 PM PST by lizol

Russian Plant Launches Production of New Sukhoi Tactical Bomber

The Novosibirsk Chkalov Aviation Production Association (NAPO) is launching production of the Su-34 bomber, the plant’s general director, Aleksandr Bobryshev, has told Itar-Tass.

NAPO has begun implementing a state order for the Russian air force, building the first Su-34 mass-production tactical bomber, Bobryshev explained.

“The Su-34’s radio-electronic equipment can be compared to fifth-generation aircraft,” Bobryshev said. The Su-34’s onboard equipment and weapons allow it to destroy precise protected targets in any weather, day or night. “This multipurpose aircraft can make missile strikes against targets on the ground and is also effective in air combat,” Bobryshev said.

Bobryshev said that five such tactical strike aircraft would be built in the next two years. The prototype Su-34s, which have successfully undergone tests, were also built at the Novosibirsk plant.

The aircraft has a take-off weight of 44.3 tons, a combat payload of 8 tons and a maximum range of 4,000 km. If refuelled once its range extends to 7,000 km.

NAPO is part of the Sukhoi holding.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: airforce; aviation; bomber; miltech; russia; su34; sukhoi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 03/31/2005 2:18:32 PM PST by lizol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

Ping


2 posted on 03/31/2005 2:19:06 PM PST by lizol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki


3 posted on 03/31/2005 2:21:46 PM PST by sanchez810
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Well they are supposed to be on our side now.


4 posted on 03/31/2005 2:22:49 PM PST by U S Army EOD (My US Army daughter outshot everybody in her basic training company.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Looks like a big 'ol F-15 with some kind of bulbous aft thingy.


5 posted on 03/31/2005 2:23:52 PM PST by andyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol
More Su-34 info here.
6 posted on 03/31/2005 2:29:35 PM PST by Bosco (Remember how you felt on September 11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

7 posted on 03/31/2005 2:35:14 PM PST by spetznaz (Nuclear tipped ICBMs: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andyk

The bulbous aft thingy is a rear-facing radar.


8 posted on 03/31/2005 2:36:36 PM PST by spetznaz (Nuclear tipped ICBMs: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: andyk
Just an extended Su-30.


9 posted on 03/31/2005 2:37:16 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

LOL, thanks.


10 posted on 03/31/2005 2:37:31 PM PST by andyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lizol
Bobryshev said that five such tactical strike aircraft would be built in the next two years.

A production rate of 2.5 airframes a year?

Hell, they'd probably lose more than that due to accidents...

11 posted on 03/31/2005 2:38:05 PM PST by Poohbah (I'm in the WPPFF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Russian armaments industry is hurting, this is good news for them.


12 posted on 03/31/2005 2:40:34 PM PST by 1texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Which is just an extension of the SU-27, which is an extension of the ripped off F-15 design. These craft are supposed to have amazing radar systems though.


13 posted on 03/31/2005 2:44:19 PM PST by ChinaThreat (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

check this out.


14 posted on 03/31/2005 2:48:40 PM PST by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: andyk


hemorrhoids?
15 posted on 03/31/2005 2:50:11 PM PST by F105-D ThunderChief (That "THUD" you heard was the Collapse of the DemocRats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ChinaThreat
...the SU-27, which is an extension of the ripped off F-15 design.

That's a laugh and a half! It may make you feel better to believe such a fairy tale, but it isn't so.

16 posted on 03/31/2005 3:02:39 PM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

" That's a laugh and a half! It may make you feel better to believe such a fairy tale, but it isn't so."

Ok. Chew on this:

"In 1969, the United States Air Force (USAF) selected the McDonnell Douglas F-15 as the winner of the service's "Fighter Experimental (FX)" program. Faced with a formidable new American threat, the Soviet government immediately issued a request for a new fighter of their own to match the F-15, under the designation "Perspektivnyi Frontovi Istrebitel (PFI / Prospective Frontal Fighter)". The program was also apparently referred to as the "anti-F-15"."

"To an extent, however, the "copycat" accusation wasn't based completely on snobbery, since the USSR, particularly in Stalin's day, pragmatically did not hesitate to borrow, copy, or steal useful foreign technologies. In fact, the MiG and Sukhoi OKBs occasionally accused each other of copying as well."



17 posted on 03/31/2005 3:21:13 PM PST by ChinaThreat (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
It remains to be seen if the Su 34'S engines really last past 1000 hrs as the Russians claim.

Article excerpt:
In 1999, the USAF completed a highly successful field service evaluation of the F110-GE-129 powering the F-15E, during which time the engine surpassed 1,700 engine flights hours on the aircraft. In fact, the USAF extended the program beyond the 1,000 hours originally envisioned due to the engine's remarkable performance and the high mission readiness rate of the aircraft/engine combination.

F-15's have real combat time history.
Russian,India,China..[Whatever...]
How will their birds really hold up under duration tasking.
Lots of glowing reports on Saturn NPO engines.
Internet publications are one thing.....proof in the field under time is the true margin.
Does Saturn NPO have a UPS airfreight shipping contract?
At least India has a call centre : )

18 posted on 03/31/2005 7:12:35 PM PST by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah

:0) About the same rate as the Raptor. Heck are we still scheduled to buy any? They keep cutting the quota down.


19 posted on 03/31/2005 9:36:38 PM PST by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Light Speed

Ask the Indians, they used Russian equipment to beat Pakistan in 3 wars.


20 posted on 03/31/2005 9:38:47 PM PST by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson