This is stupid. The law only said that they had to so a "de novo" review. The courts did. The courts are allowed to choose and define what constitutes "de novo." Does it mean interview all witnesses again? Get new tests? The court gets to decide. That is what people here NEVER got. Even if the court had a complete, top-to-bottom de novo review with neurologists, the Schaivo side could pick two, the Schindlers two, and the COURT ONE. It was never, ever, in a zillion years going to yield a different result. DeLay is going overboard now.
This issue is bigger than Terri Schiavo and the details of her case.
there was NEW evidence which greer REFUSED to allow or consider. if you are satisfied that Terri received true justice in the courts, then you and I are on vastly differing sides of this issue.
Well the honorable Senator from PA, Rick Santorum, says otherwise. I think I will listen to him.