It seems clear that there is no ethics in 'bioethics'.
Which do 'art appreciation' courses teach people to appreciate: the works of Jackson Polluck and Karl Richter (whose painting, "Gray", is pictured at right), or the works of William Bouguereau (whose works are featured prominently at
www.artrenewal.com? I would posit that they teach people to appreciate the former because there would be no need to teach them to appreciate the latter. It takes much more study to convince people of something that is patently false than to show them what is obviously true.