Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terri Schiavo Cremated Amid Family Feud
Fox News Alert ^ | 4/2/05 | Fox News

Posted on 04/02/2005 11:39:29 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

Edited on 04/02/2005 5:10:27 PM PST by Lead Moderator. [history]

Terri Schiavo Cremated Amid Family Feud

Saturday, April 02, 2005

TAMPA, Fla.  Terri Schiavo's body was cremated Saturday as disagreements continued between her husband and her parents, who were unable to have their own independent expert observe her autopsy.

The cremation was carried out according to a court order issued Tuesday establishing that Michael Schiavo () had the right to make such decisions, said his lawyer, George Felos. He said plans for burying her ashes in Pennsylvania, where she grew up, had not yet been completed.

Terri Schiavo's parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, had wanted to bury their daughter in Pinellas County so they could visit her grave.

Terri Schiavo, 41, died Thursday after the removal of the feeding tube that had kept her alive since 1990, when she suffered brain damage that court-appointed doctors determined had placed her in a persistent vegetative state (). Her parents had fought in court to keep her alive, disputing the doctors' opinions and saying there was hope of improvement.

Full article here


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: assassinatedbyjudges; autopsyisoveridiots; blackthursday331; death; destroyingevidence; evidencetampering; felos; perfectmurder; schiavo; schindler; scientology; terri; terrismurder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700701-717 next last
To: supercat; Smartaleck

Plus I don't think the nurses that came forward all work at the same facility or cared for Terri during the same time period. The nurses that talked about MS's obsessiveness about Terri's care were early in her illness. IIRC they said he was less concerned about the actual therapy than whether she looked like she was being given good care...hair and make-up done, turned over often enough to not get bed sores, etc. These nurses that gave depositions were reprimanded for GIVING Terri attention (i.e. bites of jello, a wet wash cloth to suck on, both of which, according to them, she thoroughly enjoyed). When she first arrived at the hospice facility, they used to wheel her out to the nurses station for part of the day and I know they got in trouble for that. In spite of that, one of the Schindler's lawyers was on Sean Hannity last week and said she has 8 depositions (they weren't allowed to submit them as evidence, but I can't remember if she said why) from nurses who all testified to how responsive Terri was. Of the few that were brave enough to step forward and talk about MS's abuse, at least 2 have lost their jobs, so that may not have been the best way to get revenge.

Cindie


661 posted on 04/04/2005 2:08:58 AM PDT by gardencatz (I may look like a girl but I'm not, I'm a cyborg! -- Katsura)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies]

To: Smartaleck
I have read the entire deposition. The Doctor was very clear in his statement that "if" a trauma was the cause of the injuries - they could not have been older than 12 - 18 months.

He also "admitted" that it would be typical to advance "alternative" possibilities so that the attending physician can make a sound decision.

It was not his role to make a diagnosis, nor to determine cause. Instead, to interpret what the images show and make a report of those findings.

Earlier, you stated that the Doctor did not sign the report & that he did not know who did. This is partially true. The report itself is unsigned. It is initialed as reviewed by another doctor.

Furthermore, the statements of the two doctors regarding the "fractures" are out of context. The first claimed he saw "no evidence of fracture" (or words to that effect). This much is true. However, that statement is in regards to one of Terri's ARMS. The other referred to one of her knees. Neither one of them addresses the spinal compression fracture.

Just out of curiosity - were the two attending physicians / the other radiologists (??) deposed / otherwise give testimony? I ask because the "defense" exhibits where all affidavits, meaning there was no "cross examination" of them before this deposition was taken.

All of the above is simply for "completeness". I would truly be interested if you had any links for further reading.
662 posted on 04/04/2005 2:12:00 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 600 | View Replies]

To: supercat

"Destroying a spouse's wedding ring, however, is an act with a very clear symbolic meaning. Anyone who fails to understand that is, at best, an absolute clod."

This is true, but I would submit that he felt her already dead based on what he had been told by the doctors and litigated in court.

Obviously a lot of people don't agree with that, but a great deal of his actions make more sense when seen from that viewpoint......right or wrong.


663 posted on 04/04/2005 4:13:45 AM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 652 | View Replies]

To: lakey
"This man appears to be cruel beyond words. Any criticism he gets, he brought on himself."

I think he truly believed she was completely un-aware. As such all those things you mentioned really don't matter nor are they cruel. (I"m not saying I agree, but that seems to be his mindset right or wrong.)

Indeed he has by his actions invited criticism but most of it hinges on the premise that he gave up on her. Was he correct in doing so? The courts felt that he was which doesn't make it "right" but does have the cover of sanction his actions.

Would she have had a living will directing a feeding tube removal would he still be criticized? Maybe. Her parents still may have wished to keep her alive too in direct opposition to her wishes and some would still criticize him.
664 posted on 04/04/2005 4:25:19 AM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 656 | View Replies]

To: supercat

"Is being "overly agressive" in such cases the mark of a loving husband or a control freak?"

Probably both......and probably not inconsistent with a lot of young adults in their 20's who are scared.


665 posted on 04/04/2005 4:28:59 AM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies]

To: drt1
That guy [Felos] is downright CREEPY!I can't stand to see him and immediately switch if he come on. Very, very scary and infuriating at the same time.

The Jack Kervorkian of lawyers. Utterly ghoulish. Why is it that all the merchants of death have that same greenish pallor?

666 posted on 04/04/2005 4:29:17 AM PDT by N. Beaujon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gardencatz
One who lost her job was not because of what she said regarding Terri, but that she was accusing many of the nurses in the hospital of intentionally killing people.

(I looked yesterday for the source of this without luck. I believe it was in a news article though.)

It wasn't just Greer that dismissed their charges though. The guardian ad litem's that visited the hospitals and talked to personnel did too.

For what it's worth, the 3 I looked at weren't RN's but those with lesser education and qualifications such as LPN. Actually, giving someone in her condition bits of jello could be seen as an attempt to kill her? The lower brain stem part of her brain was functioning and her auto-reflex of swallowing was funtioning at some point, however by introduction food orally to someone like that risks the possibility they might aspirate the food and choke.
667 posted on 04/04/2005 4:39:29 AM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 661 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate
And the additions for completeness are worthy. Thanks.

I don't think the depositions of other doctors are available. I wonder why? Perhaps the parents or their supporters are only "leaking" court papers that serve their purpose? Don't know.

As you rightly point out he was only commenting on what he saw and not making a diagnosis. However, this is not an end all to an understanding as what may or may not be there. It is only ONE tool used for assessment and not Gospel so to speak.

I find it peculiar that people are willing to put so much weight on a single bone scan, while at the same time insisting that a single CT-scan shouldn't be used to assess her PVS state and that other test should have been conducted for a more complete assessment. Can't have it both ways. :-)
668 posted on 04/04/2005 4:48:11 AM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies]

To: Smartaleck
Can't have it both ways.

Consistency hasn't exactly been the hallmark of these discussions. Nor facts, reasoned level headed discussion, restrained emotions...

669 posted on 04/04/2005 6:12:47 AM PDT by Jotmo ("Voon", said the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: Jotmo

"Nor facts, reasoned level headed discussion, restrained emotions..."

It ain't easy. LOL


670 posted on 04/04/2005 6:21:01 AM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies]

To: Smartaleck
I find it peculiar that people are willing to put so much weight on a single bone scan, while at the same time insisting that a single CT-scan shouldn't be used to assess her PVS state and that other test should have been conducted for a more complete assessment. Can't have it both ways. :-)

Not the same thing. Diagnosing bone trauma is much less complicated than diagnosing any brain abnormality. The CT scan would be enough if that was the current standard for diagnosing PVS and provided an accurate diagnosis most of the time. It doesn't. All the following are necessary for a diagnosis (from a letter by Dr. Felder, Board Certified Neurologist and attending neurologisit at U of Pittsburg Med. Ctr. posted on the justice for Terri website): EEG (electroencephalogram) showing cortical brainwave activity, PET (Positron Emission Tomography) Scan to show a reduction in cerebral metabolism, SSEP (Somatosensory Evoked Potential) to show brainstem neurophysiologic functioning and, MRI scan of her brain to show anatomical disruption. Most neurologists also recommend spending time with the patient (i.e. over a period of months, not 45 minutes). Dr. Felder's letter also expressed concern that Terri's EEG and CAT scan were several years old and wouldn't show changes in her brain. Even with the above tests, PVS is often misdiagnosed (one of those misdiagnosed PVS patients who made a rare complete recovery was, ironically, diagnosed by Dr. Cranford who also diagnosed Terri). Currently, there's no way to know who will recover (either fully or partially) and who won't or how long that recover will take. Evidently, neurologists have made some incredible strides in just the past few years both diagnostically and in treatment. Dr. Felder is just one of many neurologists who expressed, in writing, their concern about Terri not being given a full (recent) battery of tests to properly diagnose her condition. These were, of course, submitted to Judge Greer who refused to consider them.

Cindie

671 posted on 04/04/2005 8:01:33 AM PDT by gardencatz (I may look like a girl but I'm not, I'm a cyborg! -- Katsura)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers

He has a point re. the hurricanes. God, after all, destroyed the Soviet Union because it was wicked. Some theologians like Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell believe the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks were a wakeup call from God to remind American to mend its wicked ways. Not only would it not surprise me to see Florida get hit with some really hellacious (literally) storms this Summer, but the soaring energy prices and increasing threats of terrorism are just hints of what the almighty has in store for our nation after the toruture and murder of Terri S. Hold on to your hats, folks, you aint see nothing yet!


672 posted on 04/04/2005 8:04:11 AM PDT by Walkure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: supercat

It is a miracle that she lasted that long without hydration. It would not surprise me if one day Terri Schiavo is made a Saint of the Catholic Church. The late Pope would surely have canonized her; now we must see if his successor will. Why do I say this.

1. She was apparently a devout catholic who attended mass at least weekly.

2. Her survival for almost 2 weeks without water or food (see above) was literally miraculous.

3. For 15 years she was chaste, without sin, and suffered great mortification of the flesh.

4. She was martyred by those hostile to religion.

5. She died not for ALL sins as our Saviour did, but for 1 particular sin; the sin of callousness.

There are more reasons, I am sure, but this should be at least enough for beatification if not outright canonization.


673 posted on 04/04/2005 8:10:51 AM PDT by Walkure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies]

To: Smartaleck
One who lost her job was not because of what she said regarding Terri, but that she was accusing many of the nurses in the hospital of intentionally killing people. (I looked yesterday for the source of this without luck. I believe it was in a news article though.)

This is a pretty strong allegation to make without proof. The only thing I know that comes close is a nurse who was interviewed by Sean Hannity that worked at the hospice. They had a petition circulating about Terri's "right to die" and this nurse refused to sign. She thought the whole thing was appalling and said so. That's not the same as accusing nurses of killing people.

It wasn't just Greer that dismissed their charges though. The guardian ad litem's that visited the hospitals and talked to personnel did too.

They couldn't talk without losing their jobs. Carla Iyers, who still has friends in the facility she was fired from, begged them to come forward with what they knew, but they were too afraid. However, those same guardians also recommended MS NOT be given permanent guardianship of Terri.

For what it's worth, the 3 I looked at weren't RN's but those with lesser education and qualifications such as LPN. Actually, giving someone in her condition bits of jello could be seen as an attempt to kill her? The lower brain stem part of her brain was functioning and her auto-reflex of swallowing was funtioning at some point, however by introduction food orally to someone like that risks the possibility they might aspirate the food and choke.

Carla Iyer was an RN, but the others weren't, that's true. However, I don't think one has to be a registered anything to recognize abuse in a patient you take care of daily, nor to know whether that person is responsive to you. Obviously, though, she didn't choke (but if she had she WAS in a facility where, presumably, someone on the staff would know CPR, if they even bothered). However, since MS was going to court to have her killed, I highly doubt he was upset at the prospect of Terri's choking to death...it certainly would have taken less time than the 13 days she spent dehydrating and starving and might have saved him a few thousand dollars in lawyer's fees.

There is also quite a bit of evidence from nurses, Terri's family, notes MS made on her chart, instructions given by the admininstration, etc. that Terri was to have NO stimulation, not so much as her blinds opened and flowers in her room (which was, by the way, illegal since under FL law she, like any other disabled patient, was supposed to be receiving therapy). Thus, MS's objection was more likely due to his obsession with Terri not being given any kind of stimulation/therapy that might prove she wasn't a carrot. Surely if we can take as gospel MS and his two relatives knowing what Terri's wishes were, then we can at least apply the same standard to such a variety of sources without making yet another excuse for MS. Any one of his actions, taken separately, can be excused for one reason or another. Taken in total, however, the picture is pretty chilling.

Cindie

674 posted on 04/04/2005 8:48:38 AM PDT by gardencatz (I may look like a girl but I'm not, I'm a cyborg! -- Katsura)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies]

To: Smartaleck
Pretty serious charge. Can you back it up?

The entire county is controlled by The Church of Scientology. And yes, this was a ritual execution of person who rated 2 or below on Scientology's Emotional Tone Scale. Just like Lisa McPherson.

Yes, it can and will be backed up.

Stay tuned...

675 posted on 04/04/2005 9:41:47 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard ("We'd rather have you dead than incapable" - The Church of Scientology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
Finally, someone sees it exactly as I do! That is one of the most corrupt counties in the state which is saying a lot since we have Dade, Broward, and Palm Bch. right behind. Let's hope her murder will one day be vindicated.
676 posted on 04/04/2005 10:37:59 AM PDT by keysguy (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 675 | View Replies]

To: keysguy
Let's hope her murder will one day be vindicated.

That's going to be up to us.

677 posted on 04/04/2005 10:56:35 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard ("We'd rather have you dead than incapable" - The Church of Scientology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies]

To: gardencatz
Thanks....good info.

I heard an interview with DR. Bernadine Healy with Hannity the other day and she explained much of what you mentioned.

Anyway, back to the bone scan. It's a tool but only one and shows anomalies of bone growth. Further measurements are necessary to discern the origins.

Check out this site:
http://www.theempirejournal.com/02230551_medical_observations_sh.htm

Assuming this is an accurate journal of care, do a search for bone.....you'll see Dr. Walkers report but you'll also see several others. I'm not a DR. but I sense what he saw was the result from her immobility and sedentary state.

An increase in physical therapy was prescribed as a result.

That said, it's not fair to demand several observations in the one instance yet base an opinion on one observation in an other area of diagnosis.
678 posted on 04/04/2005 10:59:19 AM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies]

To: hillary's_fat_a**
I'd like to see some immediate frontier justice as well, so I guess that makes me a bad person too!

Me too!

679 posted on 04/04/2005 11:39:30 AM PDT by jerri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: koba37

She was murdered. It was done legally but she was still murdered.


680 posted on 04/04/2005 11:46:08 AM PDT by jerri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700701-717 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson