Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court Rules for Simpsons Cartoon (Moscow)
St. Petersburg Times ^

Posted on 04/04/2005 9:24:31 PM PDT by jwalburg

MOSCOW - After spending a day in court watching cartoons, a Moscow judge on Friday rejected a lawsuit brought against RenTV for broadcasting two American programs that the plaintiff said had piqued his young son's interest in cocaine and prompted the child to insult his mother.

The Khamovniki District Court judge rejected the claim by Igor Smykov, who filed the suit almost three years ago claiming that the cartoon series "The Simpsons" and "The Family Guy" were morally degenerate and promoted drugs, violence and homosexuality.

Smykov sued the channel in June 2002, asking for compensation of 50,000 rubles, which was eventually increased to 300,000 rubles ($10,770). He also demanded that the station be banned from airing the two programs or at least be required to show them later in the evening.

"The Simpsons," which RenTV still runs, is a popular and sophisticated cartoon series that chronicles the adventures of the Simpson family, while "The Family Guy," known in Russia as the "Griffins," is darker. Its characters include a talking dog and an evil-genius baby with ambitions of world domination and homicidal inclinations toward his mother.

Smykov said that his son Konstantin, who was 6 in 2002, approached his parents after watching an episode of "The Family Guy" and asked them what cocaine was. After he was reprimanded, Konstantin called his mother a toad, Smykov said. The suit alleged that RenTV, by broadcasting the two programs, was interfering with a child's right to a normal, healthy childhood.

But Judge Lyubov Dednyova was apparently not impressed by the evidence, which included video recordings of several of the offending episodes.

Smykov was not present in the courtroom Friday. RIA-Novosti reported that he had appeared for the start of the day's session drunk.

He sounded distraught when reached by telephone at his home that afternoon. "I am shocked to the depths of my soul," Smykov said. "I cannot even talk. It is scary. I cannot understand why no one wants to defend the children."

Smykov, who explained his absence during Friday's proceedings by saying he "could not take it" if he lost, said he nevertheless had expected to win. "I did not care about the money," he said. "I was hoping to set a judicial precedent."

Smykov and his lawyer, Larissa Pavlova, said they would appeal the decision.

RenTV lawyer Viktor Zinovyev looked relieved as he lit up a cigarette outside the courthouse Friday afternoon. "This was the absolutely correct decision," he said. "There could not be any other decision consistent with the law. Parents above all should decide what a child watches. The government cannot decide that for parents."

The decision had been expected Thursday, but the plaintiff introduced more evidence in the form of video recordings of several episodes of the two shows. The judge and both sides, along with representatives of the Federal Drug Control Service, spent most of Thursday's session watching the cartoons on a television placed in front of the judge's bench. Reporters in the courtroom could not see the screen and simply listened to the audio tracks, while Pavlova and Zinovyev traded barbs.

As evidence that "The Simpsons" promoted homosexuality, the plaintiff played for the judge an episode called "Homer's Phobia," in which the family befriends a local gay businessman. Homer Simpson is scared that his son Bart will become gay if he spends time with John, but in the end he learns to accept the businessman.

The court also watched a "Family Guy" episode titled "If I'm Dyin' I'm Lyin,'" in which the buffoonish Peter Griffin lies and says his son is dying in order to prevent his favorite television show from being canceled.

"You call this a normal family," Pavlova snapped at Zinovyev.

Several of the trial participants were laughing during the screening, including one woman from the Moscow branch of the Federal Drug Control Service, who went red in the face trying to hold in her guffaws.

The involvement of the drug police in the case could have been far from funny for RenTV, one of the last bastions of critical news coverage in the country. The service presented as evidence for the plaintiff expert opinions from linguists that the two programs contained language that promoted drugs.

RenTV has already received one warning from the federal service that oversees the mass media. The service issued the warning in November for what it deemed drug propaganda on the television show "Priznaki Zhizni," or "Signs of Life," with host Artyom Troitsky. Under Russian law, a second warning could result in the channel having its license revoked.

RenTV spokeswoman Maria Olshanskaya said the channel was "obviously satisfied" with the court decision.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: familyguy; russia; simpsons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
The corrupting influence of American TV isn't quite corrupting enough.
1 posted on 04/04/2005 9:24:39 PM PDT by jwalburg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jwalburg

Especially considering that The Simpsons is one of the greatest conservative shows of all time.


2 posted on 04/04/2005 9:27:31 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Huh?


3 posted on 04/04/2005 9:27:47 PM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear tipped ICBMs: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Wha?


4 posted on 04/04/2005 9:29:05 PM PDT by SoDak (If you're a monthly donor, hoist that rag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

The Simpons is a celebration of the Nuclear family and always has been. And they make of fun of liberal sacred cows like nobody's business.


5 posted on 04/04/2005 9:29:27 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
Huh?

Ditto. What kind of 'conservative' show would portray Bible-believing Christians as 'The Simpson's' do with their over the top depiction of Ned Flanders and his family?

Conservative?

Not in my book.
6 posted on 04/04/2005 9:30:32 PM PDT by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Borges
I know they make fun of various sacred cow issues, and the episodes i used to watch back then (that thing has been going on forever) were hilarious (and i am certain they still are). But calling them a celebration of the nuclear family seems like a stretch. While funny i'd say they are a caricature of the nuclear family.

But you might be right. I've not watched a lot of the Simpsons ( i only watched the first 2 seasons back when before time constraints got a hold of me). And it was a funny program.

7 posted on 04/04/2005 9:32:57 PM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear tipped ICBMs: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mad Mammoth
Ned Flanders is a good person and exemplifies virtue, charity and humility. Or would you rather they not be portrayed at all or be portrayed as psychotics and child molesters? No other family on TV goes to Church as much as the Simpsons
8 posted on 04/04/2005 9:33:09 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
The show got great in Season 3. The early Bart centered episodes are what got the show in trouble with Conservatives. As it started focusing more on Homer it became genuinely inspired.
9 posted on 04/04/2005 9:39:28 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
Smykov was not present in the courtroom Friday. RIA-Novosti reported that he had appeared for the start of the day's session drunk.

D'oh!

10 posted on 04/04/2005 9:42:46 PM PDT by Grim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grim

LOL


11 posted on 04/04/2005 9:50:58 PM PDT by jwalburg (Those buried included children still clutching toys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Grim

12 posted on 04/04/2005 9:55:46 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I knew before I clicked on the thread that I'd find your name inside :)


13 posted on 04/04/2005 9:59:10 PM PDT by silent_jonny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: silent_jonny

Man's got to do what a man's got to do. :-) Last time I posted in a Simpsons thread it made the Nightly News.


14 posted on 04/04/2005 10:02:49 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Nightly News? Do tell.


15 posted on 04/04/2005 10:04:10 PM PDT by silent_jonny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: silent_jonny
There was a long thread when they had that Gay Marriage episode. I was defending the show as a whole and one of the Network news shows showed the thread as part of their coverage of the controversy surrounding the episode. You know the 'right wing response'. I hear they showed a screen shot with one of my posts on it as well as some of the anti- posts.
16 posted on 04/04/2005 10:06:40 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Hey I was on that thread, too--one of them anyway.

That "gay marriage" episode was the lowest I've ever seen The Simpsons go, and I admit some of it was funny, but overall it was too "tolerant". The one last night was much better, about Homer being a prison snitch. LMAO!

17 posted on 04/04/2005 10:09:59 PM PDT by silent_jonny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Borges
You are right, Sir.

The series poked gentle fun at Ned Flanders. And mercilessly ripped into Mayor Quimby, who was obviously a Kennedy.

18 posted on 04/04/2005 10:31:43 PM PDT by caspera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Borges

You might want to pay a little more attention to the show when you watch it.


19 posted on 04/04/2005 11:34:43 PM PDT by flashbunny (Every thought that enters my head requires its own vanity thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mad Mammoth
What kind of 'conservative' show would portray Bible-believing Christians as 'The Simpson's' do with their over the top depiction of Ned Flanders and his family?

Conservative?

Not in my book.

Christianity Today disagreed.

20 posted on 04/05/2005 12:21:39 AM PDT by jennyp (WHAT I'M READING NOW: Mn17#mg 5gu2Ee 0%Ae by Howard & LeBlanc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson