To: soundandvision
Does anyone out there know if the stricture agains cousins marrying just a nineteenth-century Darwinian hangover or perhaps a wee bit more ancient and universal? These advocates and their fashionable academic enablers seem to want to make it look like the next worst thing to eugenics.
15 posted on
04/05/2005 11:49:18 AM PDT by
sinanju
To: sinanju
It ain't universal. In most of the world there is no taboo against cousins marrying. I imagine most of us only have to go back maybe 5 generations or so before we run into ancestors who were cousins.
69 posted on
04/05/2005 12:11:39 PM PDT by
ChicagoHebrew
(Hell exists, it is real. It's a quiet green meadow populated entirely by Arab goat herders.)
To: sinanju
It's not Darwin, it's Malthus who came up with the charts that figured out the likelihood of a recessive trait coming to the fore.
Link to Malthus
109 posted on
04/05/2005 12:57:01 PM PDT by
johnb838
(Blessed Are The Dead, Who Die In The Lord, For They Rest From Their Labors.)
To: sinanju
Darwinian hangover.
Now, if a family keeps doing this over and over and over, that is a problem.
But, once or twice isn't going to result in a significantly higher chance of genetic problems.
129 posted on
04/05/2005 1:46:07 PM PDT by
rwfromkansas
(http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson