To: soundandvision
First Cousins? Too close. Explains the dysfunction and scary creatures inhabiting the various monarchies.
3 posted on
04/05/2005 11:45:22 AM PDT by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: lilylangtree
And, then you don't have an excuse for spending holidays away from your own family.....
5 posted on
04/05/2005 11:46:35 AM PDT by
hispanarepublicana
(I was Lucy Ramirez when being Lucy Ramirez was't cool.)
To: lilylangtree
First Cousins? Too close. Explains the dysfunction and scary creatures inhabiting the various monarchies.According to a well placed source of mine (formerly well placed), this custom is quite common in the Arab world..
6 posted on
04/05/2005 11:46:39 AM PDT by
Paradox
(Occam was probably right.)
To: lilylangtree
Hey, in my family, you go to family reunions for your dates. And marrying beneath you refers to generations, not station in life. "Yep, ol' Fred sure married beneath him - that cousin was TWICE removed!"
10 posted on
04/05/2005 11:48:04 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(Drooling moron since 1998...)
To: lilylangtree
Does that include the scary creatures and dysfunctions within the Clinton Monarchy?
14 posted on
04/05/2005 11:48:54 AM PDT by
Zeppelin
(Keep on FReepin' on.....)
To: lilylangtree
The "various monarchies" maintained the old standard of not marrying within 4 degrees of consanguinity. The nobles and commoners generally married much closer than that.
If you've ever taken a good look at what happened, virtually a single family related various ways to the descendants of Hugh Capet ended up occupying all the thrones in every European kingdom.
All that diversity probably aided in fostering eccentricity in the royal families.
27 posted on
04/05/2005 11:52:40 AM PDT by
muawiyah
To: lilylangtree
Have you ever done your own family?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson