Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Judges Made Them Do It (New York Times Liberals Attack GOP Criticism Of Judicial Tyranny Alert)
New York Times ^ | 04/06/05 | New York Times Editorial

Posted on 04/06/2005 12:19:57 AM PDT by goldstategop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: johnmilken
As long the laws are moral, yes, we ought to obey them. I don't take kindly to cops being complicit in cold-blooded murder.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
21 posted on 04/06/2005 3:59:02 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Where is the outrage from the NYT when Democrats call Republicans "the extra chromosome right wing" or just plain Nazis? They're right in there cheering them on, or at least ignoring this kind of heinous behaviour.


22 posted on 04/06/2005 4:04:55 AM PDT by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

It was appalling when the New York Times slandered and smeared about Republican after Republican who did not toe their neo-communist dogma. But when they lie outright, and present fiction as fact, claiming that Republicans back violence, then it is time to get really scared.

It happened on Wednesday, in a moment that was horrifying even by the rock-bottom standards of the relentless smear campaign by liberal cultists are conducting against the nation's Republicans. They took Senator John Cornyn's comments completely out of context, and tried to link them to a completely unrelated courthouse shooting by a deranged convict. These prevaricators made these specious claims, and yet still pretend to be a press which supposedly protects the truth and reports fairly.

Readers could only cringe at the outright lies and smears posed as fact by the New York Times, as they reachingly stretched desperately to try to link Mr. Cornyn's comments with completely unrelated events. It was sickening that a 'newspaper' would publicly lie, offering wild speculation and careening conclusion as examples of any reporting, let alone as legitimate truth.


23 posted on 04/06/2005 4:16:09 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Cleverly Arranging 1's And 0's Since 11110111011...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Actually this is a flat out lie

http://cornyn.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=236007

"I wonder whether there may be some connection between the perception in some quarters on some occasions where judges are making political decisions yet are unaccountable to the public, that it builds up and builds up to the point where some people engage in violence, certainly without any justification, but that is a concern I have that I wanted to share. "

He didn't excuse it at all. But the Times will run a correction at the back in small print.

G-d they hate the internet.

They can no longer savagely lie.

24 posted on 04/06/2005 4:19:19 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Cleverly Arranging 1's And 0's Since 11110111011...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

All the news that's fit to slant.


25 posted on 04/06/2005 4:21:08 AM PDT by sauropod (Life under Dictatorship is far more safer, than behind the bars of your democracy. - Iraq Mujahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Slant, hell.

They're up to full-bore lying these days.

26 posted on 04/06/2005 4:21:55 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Cleverly Arranging 1's And 0's Since 11110111011...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; ken5050; Gabz; Howlin; Liz; PilloryHillary; doug from upland; bert; Bob J; ...
It was appalling when the New York Times slandered and smeared about Republican after Republican who did not toe their neo-communist dogma. But when they lie outright, and present fiction as fact, claiming that Republicans back violence, then it is time to get really scared.

It happened on Wednesday...." --- Scared, yes. AND --

It is also time to get very, very angry. Angry enough to put a fire in the belly to do everything possible to throw a monkey wrench into that Marxist propaganda machine--lawfully.

"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival . . . .There may be even a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." -- Winston Churchill

27 posted on 04/06/2005 7:46:45 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (ATTN. MARXIST RED MSM: I RESENT your "RED STATE" switcheroo using our ELECTORAL MAP as PROPAGANDA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
They're up to full-bore lying these days.

Memogate II --- "Republican talking points" (barf alert)........

As long as that worked for them to mold public opinion.............. they'll KEEP DOING IT.

And FRIST is a HUGE pussy!

28 posted on 04/06/2005 8:43:27 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Advanced Directive -- don't step on my blue suede shoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: johnmilken
"What law did Greer not enforce or twist?"

You can't be serious. The Constitution IS LAW. For starters, she was ordered not merely to have the feeding tube removed, but that EVEN WITHOUT THE FEEDING TUBE she was disallowed from receiving water or nourishment of any kind through the mouth by any means. This is THE FIRST TIME this has ever been ordered by a US Court at any level. Don't talk about "what about all the other cases like this......" There are no other cases like this.

And, Greer got critical facts confused. Is it OK for judges to get critical facts confused as long as they're following the law?

29 posted on 04/06/2005 9:20:10 AM PDT by cookcounty (Army Vet, Army Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MrDem

I used 'guardian' advisedly because MS did precious little to 'guard' his wife, that was, hoever, his legal status.


30 posted on 04/06/2005 10:58:32 AM PDT by johnmilken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson