Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beware unplanned (Microsoft) SP2 downloads on April 12
informationweek (note: blog posting) ^ | 04/06/2005 | John Foley

Posted on 04/06/2005 6:57:37 AM PDT by bedolido

On Tuesday, April 12, Microsoft will turn off the blocking feature that has made it possible for some enterprises to block Windows XP Service Pack 2 downloads by employees who use Automatic Update. That means in companies that used the blocking tool, SP2 will be downloaded automatically to desktop computers that use Windows' Automatic Update feature.

In its April 4 report on business adoption of Windows XP SP2, AssetMetrix warned that a surge of SP2 downloads on April 12 could stress IT help desks and cause "productivity brownouts" among employees. But a Microsoft spokesman downplayed that scenario, saying fewer than 1% of Microsoft's enterprise customers ever used the blocking tool anyway. Small businesses and consumers will be unaffected by the change, he says, because the blocking tool was not available to them.

AssetMetrix advises companies that did use the blocking tool, yet now want employees to upgrade to SP2, to do so gradually before April 12 in order to avoid a big-bang support problem. It's worth noting that April 12, as the second Tuesday of the month, is the same day that Microsoft is scheduled to release its monthly software patches, if any are forthcoming.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: beware; downloads; microsoft; sp2; unplanned
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
Business Adoption Of Windows XP SP2 Still Low, Survey Finds April 4, 2005
1 posted on 04/06/2005 6:57:37 AM PDT by bedolido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bedolido
You'll get Service Pack 2 if you want it or not. Or Microsoft will simply disable Windows.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
2 posted on 04/06/2005 6:59:57 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

so there!


3 posted on 04/06/2005 7:03:31 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I refuse to download SP2, tried it about 4 months ago and it messed up my PC. Thank goodness for the system restore program on my PC.


4 posted on 04/06/2005 7:03:44 AM PDT by alice_in_bubbaland (We will always remember.We will always be proud.We will always be prepared, so we may always be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bedolido

marked for later reading


5 posted on 04/06/2005 7:09:55 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alice_in_bubbaland
and it messed up my PC.

Same here. Is this article saying we are going to get it whether we want it or not?

6 posted on 04/06/2005 7:11:30 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: alice_in_bubbaland
I refuse to download SP2, tried it about 4 months ago and it messed up my PC. Thank goodness for the system restore program on my PC.

What do you use for your restore? I've tried a few w/o success.

7 posted on 04/06/2005 7:11:31 AM PDT by bedolido (I can forgive you for killing my sons, but I cannot forgive you for forcing me to kill your sons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: alice_in_bubbaland
I've had no problems with it. Microsoft is sure to come out with one more Service Pack until Longhorn's debut.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
8 posted on 04/06/2005 7:12:30 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bedolido

This is one of the reasons why I stayed with Windows 2000.

Microsoft is the like Geico, except that it's their
DISsatisfaction rate that's 95%, but they are working
hard to convert that last 5% that don't hate MS yet.


9 posted on 04/06/2005 7:12:43 AM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Sorry, but if people don't install it, they shouldn't complain about security problems. It's time to deal with reality.

It's been installed on 30+ PC's here at my office and I installed it on 50+ PC's at my children's school and had no problems.

10 posted on 04/06/2005 7:13:02 AM PDT by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alice_in_bubbaland

What went wrong, specifically? I've done dozens of sp2 installations with no bad results.


11 posted on 04/06/2005 7:15:10 AM PDT by js1138 (There are 10 kinds of people: those who read binary, and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bedolido

Most networks at large corporations are configured so the necessary ports are not open. They allowed censored web browsing through a proxy, and that's it.


12 posted on 04/06/2005 7:16:01 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido

Other than the way that Microsoft is forcing people to accept SP2, what's wrong with it? I installed it, and I haven't noticed any new problems. Does it do something I should be aware of? Is there a reason (besides not liking to be told what to do) why people should choose not to install it?

Inquiring minds want to know.


13 posted on 04/06/2005 7:25:57 AM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
If the enterprise is first...we're next.

I recommend the use of XP AntiSpy.

It can completely turn off all methods by which Windows communicates, or "phone's home" with Microsoft. If you don't want SP2, you don't have to have it rammed down your throat.

14 posted on 04/06/2005 7:26:41 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Remember that great love and great achievements involve great risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Boundless
I heard that Microsoft is going into the vacuum-cleaner business.

Their marketing department said that "It's time we made a product that doesn't suck".

15 posted on 04/06/2005 7:28:11 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bedolido

Not sure of the brand, it came pre-installed with my Dell. My old Gateway was also pre installed w/ "Gateway Go Back". Both work well, it's saved me a few times!


16 posted on 04/06/2005 7:29:42 AM PDT by alice_in_bubbaland (We will always remember.We will always be proud.We will always be prepared, so we may always be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Piranha
I had system freezeups, didn't want to deal with the BS.

BTW when you installed SP2 did you have to tweek anything?

Inquiring minds want to know. (LOL)

17 posted on 04/06/2005 7:33:08 AM PDT by alice_in_bubbaland (We will always remember.We will always be proud.We will always be prepared, so we may always be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bedolido

If you are forced to download, does the supplemental EULA (software licence) that is included, have any validity whatsoever?


18 posted on 04/06/2005 7:33:51 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138

THe only thing SP2 did on my network is break a few apps. We quickly made exceptions in the SP2 firewall and all was good. Frankly, I think not going to sp2 is foolish as it helps a lot more things than it hurts.


19 posted on 04/06/2005 7:35:19 AM PDT by Salo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Piranha
Other than the way that Microsoft is forcing people to accept SP2, what's wrong with it? I installed it, and I haven't noticed any new problems.

Many larger corporations have many different hardware platforms/configurations which may or may not be compatible with SP2 without detailed attention being paid to the patching process.

Those corporations have now got to decide whether it is more cost effective to allow the auto update to take place and put out the 'fires' as they come up or initiate a project to turn off the auto update function on all desktops and perform as desk by desk controlled update.

Either way it's a gamble and it's gonna cost em.

20 posted on 04/06/2005 7:37:00 AM PDT by Dad2Angels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson