1 posted on
04/11/2005 10:12:58 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...
2 posted on
04/11/2005 10:13:32 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
Bah! This guy is not too bright.
Namely, even if spammers were to move to other avenues, it's still worth closing port 25 to stop them from using it.
Sooo.... spammers can find a way around it but it is worth blocking it anyway.... sure, if that is worth it then why not block all ports and shut everything down? ISP's blocking 25 is a stupid solution. Microsoft actually making harder to hijack your computer is the solution.
4 posted on
04/11/2005 10:28:04 AM PDT by
TalonDJ
To: Dark Wing
10 posted on
04/11/2005 10:41:27 AM PDT by
Thud
To: All
This highway to hell???
16 posted on
04/11/2005 10:52:06 AM PDT by
RockinRight
(Conservatism is common sense, liberalism is just senseless.)
To: ShadowAce
I would think that the main problem would be that the ISPs want to maintain common carrier status. If they start becoming responsible for what users do, there's no end to it.
To: ShadowAce
Fight fire with fire, spam the spammers until their servers blow. Just create a software program that sends the spam back to the spammer 1000 fold for each spam received. Probably better enacted by IPS's and not the end user for a number of reasons.
To: ShadowAce
The idiots will just come up with new zombies that use different ports.......
46 posted on
04/11/2005 11:44:48 AM PDT by
JayP56
To: ShadowAce
This must have been what happened to me about two months ago.
I started getting all sorts of "bounced" email messages and cannot deliver messages for one of my email addresses.
Before I disabled the address I was gettiing over 20,000 emails a day.
52 posted on
04/11/2005 11:52:08 AM PDT by
N. Theknow
(DUmmies: So low on the food chain they have plankton bites on their butts.)
To: ShadowAce
I dont smoke.
But I understand now. So states can shake down there residents.
Credit card co. will no longer do cigarette transactions over the net.
If they can do this Why not stop co. that use SPAM from using credit cards to get money.
If you ask me SPAMERS are a lot more annoying than smokers.
To: ShadowAce
The real problem is the people who order products advertised in spam. These are the people who make the whole game so profitable. If nobody ordered from spam, it would not be worth sending.
While it presents obvious problems, I would love to see "fake" spam (can spam be "real"?), so that when the user clicks on it and tries to order he gets a warning about stupidity. He also would have his name posted on a Fools Hall of (Sh)Fame website. Employers could check what employees tried to buy fake degrees. Businesses could check which customers tried to buy fake ID. Guys could check on which buddy tried to buy Vi4gr4 or p3n15 enlargement products.
After enough people had been humiliated in this fashion, perhaps the message would get out. Do not respond to unsolicited e-mail offers. It is a losers game.
116 posted on
04/12/2005 7:41:51 AM PDT by
evilC
([573]Tag Server Error, Tag not found)
To: Unknown Freeper
Technological Ping!
117 posted on
04/12/2005 8:22:34 AM PDT by
Onyxx
(Semper Fi....Do or Die)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson