Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ninenot
It turns out that one of the most contentious and visible issues in the 2004 election, the denial of the Eucharist to pro-abortion politicians, did not hurt the pro-life side as many said it would. The poll found that when white Catholics were asked whether or not they were more or less likely to vote for a Democrat that "is denied communion by the area's bishop for voting to support abortion rights" 49 percent said they were less likely while 33 percent said they were more likely.

Now, how can that be?

Weren't we assured, right here on this very website, by certain posters to remain nameless, that Apb. Burke and other bishops who insisted on enforcing canon law were going to end up helping the pro-abort politicians?

16 posted on 04/12/2005 2:57:32 PM PDT by B Knotts (Ioannes Paulus II, Requiescat in Pacem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: B Knotts; sinkspur
by certain posters to remain nameless, that Apb. Burke and other bishops who insisted on enforcing canon law were going to end up helping the pro-abort politicians?

I recall one in particular, who was emphatic---very emphatic---that the orthodox Bishops were effectively going to not ONLY create a "sympathy vote," but ALSO alienate Catholics.

IIRC, the emphatic noises came from a dusty little cattle-stop near Dallas.

He's on my pinglist.

26 posted on 04/12/2005 3:09:15 PM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson